Functional Types of Lexical Bundles in Reading Texts of Malaysian University English Test: A Corpus Study

Abstract

It is widely claimed that many university students were found to be unprepared for the reading demands placed upon them. To provide students with an understanding of the features of the discourses they may encounter, this study investigates lexical bundles (LBs) used in the reading passages of Malaysian University English Test (MUET), a compulsory entrance examination for tertiary education. More specifically it aims to compare and contrast the functional types of LBs found in arts and science-based reading passages. A specialised corpus of MUET test papers made up of only the reading passages categorised into two main traditional disciplines; arts and science was built using WordSmith Tools Version 5. The lists of LBs of the identified disciplines were generated using WordSmith Tools Version 5. The generated data was then analysed qualitatively based on Hyland's (2008) Functional Taxonomy. Findings revealed that although the number of LBs in both disciplines shows significant difference, many similar LBs are found. Science-based passages employ more research-based LBs whereas arts-based texts employ more participant-oriented LBs. These findings seemed to confirm that the functions of LBs are specific to particular disciplines. Hence, explicit teaching of LBs should be considered in schools and two separate sets of MUET reading tests where the first comprises of texts adopted from the scientific and technological context while the other made up of texts from the social sciences should be designed to accommodate both arts and science stream pre-university students.

Lexical Bundles in Indonesian EFL Textbooks: A Corpus Analysis

“…These research-oriented bundles indicate quantities, qualities, or measurements and also describe events. This is consistent with Allen (2009) as well as Beng and Keong (2015), who reported that the most prevalent lexical bundles in their database were those associated with the noun phrases used in academic work.…”

Lexical Bundles in Reading Passages of English Textbook for Senior High School: A Comparative Study Between Three Textbooks of Different Grades

“…With the existence of lexical bundles in reading passages in English books, it can help students understand the reading texts that are given to students. This argument is also supported by Beng and Keong (2015) who state that lexical bundles can help students understand texts. Therefore, students can benefit significantly from the existence of lexical bundles of reading texts.…”

Hispanic ESL Science Majors Need More Practice Using English for Scientific Purposes

“…At the K-12 level, English language competencies have been found not only to influence students’ socialization patterns affecting learner status (Braden, 2018) but also to restrict their access to and achievement in academic opportunities in the classroom and wider school setting (Ortmeier-Hooper, 2008). After compulsory schooling, entrance-level exams for tertiary education in scientific disciplines often require English language competencies that school-leavers cannot demonstrate (Ong Sook & Chee Keong, 2015), and frustration is common among ESL students who have repeatedly failed English competency exams for science programs (Johns, 1991). For those who are admitted, undergraduate students quickly learn that English language skills, specifically in reading comprehension, summary and paraphrase skills, are vital to their progress (Braine, 1989; Hartshorn, Evans, Egbert, & Johnson, 2017).…”