2008
DOI: 10.1126/science.1160662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Traits and Niche-Based Tree Community Assembly in an Amazonian Forest

Abstract: REPORTS microscopic analyses (15) is shown in Fig. 4. Although much remains to be learned about the molecular architecture of the midbody and the precise stereochemistry of cytokinesis, the results and model presented here provide one foothold for furthering such an understanding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

57
1,151
6
27

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,019 publications
(1,273 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
57
1,151
6
27
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, although niche‐based processes altogether were only responsible for 28% of all community assembly steps, they significantly shaped communities, both in terms of species composition and in terms of mean trait values. This is an important finding, as it might resolve seemingly contrasting findings in the literature, where some studies emphasized the importance of stochastic processes based on species abundance distributions or species area relationships (Condit, Hubbell, & LaFrankie, 1996; Hubbell, 2001; Rosindell & Cornell, 2009), while other studies pointed at the importance of niche processes based on trait–environment relationships (Cavender‐Bares, Kitajima, & Bazzaz, 2004; Cornwell & Ackerly, 2009; Kraft, Valencia, & Ackerly, 2008). Our study shows that even when stochastic processes are responsible for the majority of community assembly steps, a small contribution of niche‐based processes can already cause significant trait–environment relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, although niche‐based processes altogether were only responsible for 28% of all community assembly steps, they significantly shaped communities, both in terms of species composition and in terms of mean trait values. This is an important finding, as it might resolve seemingly contrasting findings in the literature, where some studies emphasized the importance of stochastic processes based on species abundance distributions or species area relationships (Condit, Hubbell, & LaFrankie, 1996; Hubbell, 2001; Rosindell & Cornell, 2009), while other studies pointed at the importance of niche processes based on trait–environment relationships (Cavender‐Bares, Kitajima, & Bazzaz, 2004; Cornwell & Ackerly, 2009; Kraft, Valencia, & Ackerly, 2008). Our study shows that even when stochastic processes are responsible for the majority of community assembly steps, a small contribution of niche‐based processes can already cause significant trait–environment relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our conflicting results resonate the ongoing debate attempting to discern the underlying processes of community assembly (Wennekes et al., 2012), with explanations emphasizing either stochastic processes (Hubbell, 2001; Rosindell et al., 2011, 2012) or niche‐based processes (Cornwell & Ackerly, 2014; HilleRisLambers, Adler, Harpole, Levine, & Mayfield, 2012; Kraft et al., 2007, 2008; Van der Plas, Anderson, & Olff, 2012). Here, we find that niche processes, although only responsible for a minority of community assembly steps, are responsible for the majority of trait‐based patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results lend initial support to previous findings that communities are not randomly assembled (Kraft et al. 2008; HilleRisLambers et al. 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2014) and may be particularly strong in local communities differing in topographic position (Kraft et al. 2008) or across strong edaphic or climatic gradients (Cavender‐Bares et al. 2006; Fine and Kembel 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed the opposite pattern of trait convergence in the M. guttatus – M. moschatus pair, perhaps due to less restrictive environmental conditions but a limited pollinator pool. Indeed, other studies have demonstrated that these two contrasting processes may operate simultaneously and that their effects may vary across traits (Cornwell & Ackerly, 2009; Kraft et al., 2008). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%