2013 22nd Asian Test Symposium 2013
DOI: 10.1109/ats.2013.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Test Generation at the RTL Using Swarm Intelligence and Bounded Model Checking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most recent upsurge in publications has started on 2013. As an example, these recent publications mostly focused on fault independent test generation and coverage directed test generation techniques [19,20]. We can observe a decrease in the number of publications from 2015 onward.…”
Section: Publication Trendsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most recent upsurge in publications has started on 2013. As an example, these recent publications mostly focused on fault independent test generation and coverage directed test generation techniques [19,20]. We can observe a decrease in the number of publications from 2015 onward.…”
Section: Publication Trendsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Gent et al [20] proposed a method for test generation at the RT level. This method uses a combination of a stochastic search technique and a deterministic search aimed for RTL design validation.…”
Section: Test Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along the direction of simulation based approaches, an approach for the rapid automated validation of an ultralow latency digital core [96] and polychrony based approach for the simulation at system level [97] has been developed. Along the direction of test generation, a swarm intelligence and bounded model checking based approach for functional testing [98], a coverage directed approach by machine learning [99], and an approach for test packet generation [100] were established.…”
Section: Analysis Simulation Verification and Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%