“…The smaller Tafel slope of Pt 0.23 Cu 0.64 Co 0.13 /C (in acid, 134 mV dec –1 (Figure d); in alkaline, 157 mV dec –1 (Figure e)), as compared with Pt/C (in acid, 352 mV dec –1 (Figure d); in alkaline, 220 mV dec –1 (Figure e)), showed that Pt 0.23 Cu 0.64 Co 0.13 /C had faster kinetics of the MOR, thus resulting in an enhanced activity. The activity enhancement of the MOR could be explained by the electron effect (the strain effect caused by the mismatch of the lattice constant and the ligand effect caused by the electronic state change) and the synergistic/bifunctional effect of the alloying PtCuCo nanooctahedron. , On one hand, the electron effect (i.e., compressive strain and/or ligand effect) that was triggered by the introduction of Cu and Co favored a weakening of the adsorption strength of the carbon-containing intermediate species that were adsorbed on the Pt sites. On the other hand, the surface oxyphilic Cu and Co sites would activate water and provide more reactive oxygen species (Cu-OH ads and Co-OH ads ), which were expected to oxidize the strongly adsorbed CO ads species on adjacent Pt sites (Pt-CO ads ) by a so-called synergistic/bifunctional effect. , It was easier to oxidize CO on Pt 0.23 Cu 0.64 Co 0.13 /C than on Pt/C, which was confirmed by CO stripping experiments in both acidic and alkaline electrolytes.…”