2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00704.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional specialisation of the pelvic limb of the hare (Lepus europeus)

Abstract: We provide quantitative anatomical data on the muscle-tendon architecture of the hare pelvic limb (specifically muscle mass, fascicle length, pennation angle, tendon mass and length). In addition, moment arms of major pelvic limb muscles were measured. Maximum isometric force and power of muscles, the moment of force about a joint, and tendon stress and strain were estimated. Data are compared with published data for other cursorial mammals such as the horse and dog, and a non-specialised Lagamorph, the rabbit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…front brakes are more effective than rear brakes and rear wheel propulsion is more effective than front wheel propulsion) (Gray, 1944;Gray, 1968;Lee et al, 1999), the proximate cause is likely the resulting specialization of forelimb and, to a greater extent, hindlimb structure. Evidence of such anatomical specialization is provided by the substantial fraction of muscle mass represented by hindlimb (propulsive) retractors (Pasi and Carrier, 2003;Payne et al, 2005a;Williams et al, 2007a) and, to a lesser extent, forelimb (braking) protractors (Payne et al, 2005b;Williams et al, 2007b). In addition to anatomical observations, the propulsive bias of hindlimbs and braking bias of forelimbs is reproduced by simple trotting simulations with knee-forward/elbow-back geometry (Lee and Meek, 2005).…”
Section: Individual Limb Impulse Anglesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…front brakes are more effective than rear brakes and rear wheel propulsion is more effective than front wheel propulsion) (Gray, 1944;Gray, 1968;Lee et al, 1999), the proximate cause is likely the resulting specialization of forelimb and, to a greater extent, hindlimb structure. Evidence of such anatomical specialization is provided by the substantial fraction of muscle mass represented by hindlimb (propulsive) retractors (Pasi and Carrier, 2003;Payne et al, 2005a;Williams et al, 2007a) and, to a lesser extent, forelimb (braking) protractors (Payne et al, 2005b;Williams et al, 2007b). In addition to anatomical observations, the propulsive bias of hindlimbs and braking bias of forelimbs is reproduced by simple trotting simulations with knee-forward/elbow-back geometry (Lee and Meek, 2005).…”
Section: Individual Limb Impulse Anglesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Correspondingly, all muscles of the groundhog forelimb are capable of generating only moderate-to-low power, as we hypothesized. By a comparison of mass-normalized values, power capacity of badgers (Moore et al, 2013) exceeds that of the same muscles in groundhogs, and yet no badger forelimb muscle is capable of markedly high power output as estimated for some hindlimb muscles of cursorial mammals (Williams et al, 2007a;Williams et al, 2008). In addition to digging shallow burrows for shelter, American badgers actively hunt ground-dwelling rodents by rapid excavation of their burrows (Michener, 2004), whereas as groundhogs may burrow at a slower rate to dig deeper, morecomplex burrow systems.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accounting for a Q 10 (temperature quotient) of 2−6 for V max (Pate et al, 1994;Ranatunga, 1996), a value of 7.87 FL s −1 was calculated as V max at physiologic temperature for groundhogs [37.8°C (Hayes, 1976)]. Importantly, calculations of F max and V max are only estimates, and are used here to indicate muscle functional capacity (Williams et al, 2007a;Smith et al, 2006).…”
Section: Muscle Functional Properties and Architectural Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main function of tendons is to connect muscle with bone; while, they function to reduce limb inertia especially in the distal limb (Williams et al, 2007). In addition, some of them are capable of elastic energy storage (Brown, et al, 2003b) especially superficial and deep digital flexor tendons (Payne et al, 2005a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%