2005
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Significance and Clinical Phenotype of Nontruncating Mismatch Repair Variants of MLH1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
149
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
16
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guerrette et al 43 45 Bianchi et al, 29 and Kosinski et al 46 found normal MLH1-PMS2 in vitro binding activity in their studies. Raevaara et al 45 also performed other in vitro MLH1 protein functional studies, including protein expression and stability, subcellular localization, protein-protein interaction, and repair efficiency. MLH1 K618A was found to be normal by all parameters.…”
Section: Functional Studiesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Guerrette et al 43 45 Bianchi et al, 29 and Kosinski et al 46 found normal MLH1-PMS2 in vitro binding activity in their studies. Raevaara et al 45 also performed other in vitro MLH1 protein functional studies, including protein expression and stability, subcellular localization, protein-protein interaction, and repair efficiency. MLH1 K618A was found to be normal by all parameters.…”
Section: Functional Studiesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The first three studies (Guerrette et al, 43 Kondo et al, 44 and Belvederesi et al 28 ) show that the K618A variant has substantially lower ability to bind PMS2, but that it still binds a nontrivial fraction of the available PMS2. The studies by Raevaara et al 45 and Kosinski et al, 46 however, showed no difference between K618A and wild-type MLH1 constructs with respect to PMS2 binding. The Raevaara group used a method quite different from those of the other four studies, one that may not be able to distinguish between normal and reduced binding.…”
Section: In Silico Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mut1 is an in-frame deletion (3.5 kb genomic deletion affecting codons 578-632 of exon 16 and flanking intron sequences), Mut2 is a frameshift mutation (g>a at 454-1 splice acceptor of exon 6) and Mut3 is a missense mutation (T>G at nucleotide 320 in exon 4, I107R). Mut1 and Mut2 together account for a majority of Finnish HNPCC kindreds meeting the international diagnostic criteria (Nystrom-Lahti et al, 1995), and the pathogenicity of the missense mutation (Mut3) has been verified by functional tests (Raevaara et al, 2005). The appropriate institutional review boards of the Helsinki University Central Hospital approved this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%