2010
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evq053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Shifts in Insect microRNA Evolution

Abstract: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short endogenous RNA molecules that regulate gene expression at the posttranscriptional level and have been shown to play critical roles during animal development. The identification and comparison of miRNAs in metazoan species are therefore paramount for our understanding of the evolution of body plans. We have characterized 203 miRNAs from the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum by deep sequencing of small RNA libraries. We can conclude, from a single study, that the Tribolium miRNA s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
156
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
10
156
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the miRNAs in each cluster are transcribed from the same transcriptional unit. Next, we compared the compositions of the T. cancriformis miRNA clusters with those of the arthropod D. melanogaster and Tribolium castaneum clusters (Marco et al 2010(Marco et al , 2013. Of the 11 miRNAs clusters of T. cancriformis, the compositions of four (tcf-miR-2a-2/2a/13/2b/ 71, tcf-miR-305/275, tcf-miR-92a/92b, tcf-let-7/miR-100) were (partly) conserved relative to those of D. melanogaster, whereas the compositions of five clusters (tcf-miR-2a-2/2a/ 13/2b/71, tcf-miR-2788/193, tcf-miR-305/275, tcf-miR-92a/ 92b, and tcf-let-7/miR-100) were (partly) conserved relative to those of Tribolium castaneum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that the miRNAs in each cluster are transcribed from the same transcriptional unit. Next, we compared the compositions of the T. cancriformis miRNA clusters with those of the arthropod D. melanogaster and Tribolium castaneum clusters (Marco et al 2010(Marco et al , 2013. Of the 11 miRNAs clusters of T. cancriformis, the compositions of four (tcf-miR-2a-2/2a/13/2b/ 71, tcf-miR-305/275, tcf-miR-92a/92b, tcf-let-7/miR-100) were (partly) conserved relative to those of D. melanogaster, whereas the compositions of five clusters (tcf-miR-2a-2/2a/ 13/2b/71, tcf-miR-2788/193, tcf-miR-305/275, tcf-miR-92a/ 92b, and tcf-let-7/miR-100) were (partly) conserved relative to those of Tribolium castaneum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found evidence of expression for 117 of the 131 computationally predicted homologs of D. melanogaster microRNAs. In addition, using a conservative pipeline for microRNA annotation previously established in our lab (Marco et al 2010), we identified 13 candidate novel microRNAs unique to the virilis-repleta group (Supplemental Fig. S2).…”
Section: Microrna Developmental Expression Profile In D Virilismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some D. melanogaster microRNAs are members of widely conserved animal microRNA families; however, a substantial fraction of its microRNA complement is lineage-or speciesspecific. For example, fruit flies (Diptera) and beetles (Coleoptera) diverged ∼300 mya (Wiegmann et al 2009) and share only one-third of their microRNA gene set, with the remaining microRNAs emerging after their split (Marco et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zero means that mature sequences are produced at equal levels from both arms (Marco et al, 2010). Targets were predicted by miRDB (Wienholds et al, 2005), and "-" indicate there was no data available (WangToomey et al, 2011;Zhi-Yong et al, 2011;CorstenPapageorgiou et al, 2012;MattiskeSuetani et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the relative amount of mature miRNA products from each arm of the same miRNAhairpin precursor, we performed the ''relative arm usage'' measure as reported (Marco et al, 2010). The quantity of relative arm usage was calculated as follows: Relative arm usage=log 2 (N 5 '/N 3 '); where N 5 ' is the number of reads mapped to the 5' arm of the hairpin precursor and N3' the number of reads from the 3' arm.…”
Section: Relative Arm Usagementioning
confidence: 99%