There are now several examples of single G protein-coupled receptors to which binding of specific agonists causes differential effects on the associated signaling pathways. The dopamine D 2 receptor is of special importance because the selective activation of functional pathways has been shown both in vitro and in situ. For this reason, the present work characterized a series of rigid D 2 agonists in Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with the human D 2L receptor using three distinct functional endpoints: inhibition of cAMP synthesis, stimulation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase phosphorylation, and activation of G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels (GIRKs). In this system, S-propylnorapomorphine (SNPA), R-propylnorapomorphine (RNPA), dihydrexidine (DHX), dinapsoline (DNS), and dinoxyline (DNX) all inhibited forskolinstimulated adenylate cyclase activity to the same extent as the prototypical D 2 agonist quinpirole (QP). The rank order of potency was the following: RNPA Ͼ Ͼ QP ϭ DNX Ͼ SNPA Ͼ DHX ϭ DNS. For MAP kinase phosphorylation, DHX, DNS, DNX, and RNPA had efficacy similar to QP, whereas SNPA was a partial agonist. The rank order of potency for MAP kinase phosphorylation was RNPA Ͼ Ͼ QP ϭ DNX Ͼ DHX Ͼ DNS ϭ SNPA. DNX activated GIRK channels to the same extent as QP, whereas DHX and DNS were partial agonists, and RNPA and SNPA caused no appreciable activation. These findings indicate that DHX, DNS, RNPA, and SNPA have atypical functional properties at the hD 2L receptor and display different patterns of functional selectivity. We hypothesize that this functional selectivity may be a result of ligand induction of specific conformations of the D 2L receptor that activate only selected signaling pathways.The proximal event mediating cellular signaling through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the binding of ligand, with subsequent conformational changes initiating secondary and distal events. In the past, compounds were believed to cause a single type of functional response for all effectors linked to a given receptor; hence, a compound could be labeled according to its intrinsic efficacy as full agonist, partial agonist, antagonist, or, more recently, inverse agonist. This traditional view of the receptor as operating in a digital fashion, either active or inactive, has been challenged, however, by evidence that some ligands working at a single GPCR cause markedly dissimilar degrees of activation for different effector pathways. This phenomenon that we term "functional selectivity" is vastly different from classic receptor theory. Although it is still not generally appreciated, it is probably universal. It has been demonstrated in many different receptor systems, and termed not only "functional selectivity" [dopamine D 2L receptors (Lawler et al., 1999; This work was supported by National Institutes of Health research grants MH53356 (to R.B.M.), MH40537 (to R.B.M.), NS18788 (to G.S.O.), MH42705 (to D.E.N.), and training grant NS07431.R.B.M. and D.E.N. have a sig...