2017
DOI: 10.1016/bs.apha.2017.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Selectivity at Cannabinoid Receptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantification of islet cAMP levels indicated that neither ligand affected basal or forskolin-stimulated cAMP production in either Gpr55 +/+ or Gpr55 −/− islets, or human islets, suggesting that it was unlikely that they were having inverse agonist effects at CB 1 receptors or signaling via G s -coupled receptors such as GPR119 or GPR6. However, given that there is evidence of biased agonist activity by cannabinoids [53] and we have shown that both ligands significantly elevated IP 1 production in isolated mouse and human islets we cannot rule out SR141716A and/or AM251 signalling through a nominally G s -coupled receptor via G q -biased signalling. The elevation in IP 1 implies GPR55-independent, G q-coupled receptor signalling by SR141716A and AM251 in islets and further studies using inhibitors of G q and PLC are required to confirm this mechanism of action in islets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Quantification of islet cAMP levels indicated that neither ligand affected basal or forskolin-stimulated cAMP production in either Gpr55 +/+ or Gpr55 −/− islets, or human islets, suggesting that it was unlikely that they were having inverse agonist effects at CB 1 receptors or signaling via G s -coupled receptors such as GPR119 or GPR6. However, given that there is evidence of biased agonist activity by cannabinoids [53] and we have shown that both ligands significantly elevated IP 1 production in isolated mouse and human islets we cannot rule out SR141716A and/or AM251 signalling through a nominally G s -coupled receptor via G q -biased signalling. The elevation in IP 1 implies GPR55-independent, G q-coupled receptor signalling by SR141716A and AM251 in islets and further studies using inhibitors of G q and PLC are required to confirm this mechanism of action in islets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Although much has been learned about the impact of cannabinoid agonists on oligodendrocytes in health and disease, many questions remain unexplored, such as the cannabinoid impact on OPC local migration ( Kirby et al, 2006 ; Hughes et al, 2013 ) and glutamate signaling ( Spitzer et al, 2016 ), the oligodendrocyte’s ability to produce myelin and provide metabolic support to axons ( Zecca et al, 2004 ; Saab et al, 2013 ; Simons and Nave, 2015 ). Cannabinoid agonists also comprise structurally and functional distinct ligands ( Howlett et al, 2002 ; Pertwee et al, 2010 ; Laprairie et al, 2017 ; Priestley et al, 2017 ), and as such, it is important to characterize their pharmacological profiles in cell pathologies related to oligodendrocytes and other cell types in the neuro-immune complex. Although the impact of cannabinoid extracts on MS disease progression remains inconclusive ( Pertwee, 2007 ; Pryce et al, 2015 ), the outlook is optimistic ( Arévalo-Martin et al, 2008 ; Chiurchiu et al, 2015 , 2018 ).…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an exciting discovery with obvious translational significance if specific pathways can indeed be activated to reduce non-analgesic opioid signaling. For MORs and other G-protein coupled receptors, such as the Cannabinoid 1 receptor, agonists biased toward arrestin-mediated signaling rather than G-protein-dependent signaling pathways seem to produce greater adverse side effects ( 155 , 156 ). This has led to an emphasis on developing compounds that do not recruit either of the non-visual arrestin isoforms very well.…”
Section: Not All Opioid Analgesics Are the Same: Exploring Novel Pharmentioning
confidence: 99%