2004
DOI: 10.1080/02699200410003583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional segments in tongue movement

Abstract: The tongue is a deformable object, and moves by compressing or expanding local functional segments. For any single phoneme, these functional tongue segments may move in similar or opposite directions, and may reach target maximum synchronously or not. This paper will discuss the independence of five proposed segments in the production of speech. Three studies used ultrasound and tagged Cine-MRI to explore the independence of the tongue segments. High correlations between tongue segments would suggest passive b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each muscle bundle in tongue can be further divided into smaller functionally-distinct fibre groups, referred to as functional segments , which are believed to be controlled quasi-independently in a synergistic coordination (Stone et al 2004). We divide the vertical (GG, VRT) and horizontal (TRNS) muscle fibres into five functional segments (a: posterior to e: interior), as initially proposed by Miyawaki et al (1975) based on EMG measurements from GG, and later reinforced by Stone et al (2004) using ultrasound imaging and tagged-MRI information.…”
Section: Biomechanical Modelling Of Oropharynxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each muscle bundle in tongue can be further divided into smaller functionally-distinct fibre groups, referred to as functional segments , which are believed to be controlled quasi-independently in a synergistic coordination (Stone et al 2004). We divide the vertical (GG, VRT) and horizontal (TRNS) muscle fibres into five functional segments (a: posterior to e: interior), as initially proposed by Miyawaki et al (1975) based on EMG measurements from GG, and later reinforced by Stone et al (2004) using ultrasound imaging and tagged-MRI information.…”
Section: Biomechanical Modelling Of Oropharynxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last two decades, researchers have shown a growing interest in ultrasound techniques. Ultrasound imaging has been used in many fields of linguistics and phonetics such as the interface between phonetics and phonology [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] , second language learning [10,11] , clinical phonetics [12][13][14][15] , speech development [16,17] and articulatory modeling [18] , among others. One of the advantages of this technique is that it provides a view of the global tongue con-tour in the midsagittal or coronal plane, whereas flesh-point tracking methods such as electromagnetic midsagittal articulography [19] or X-ray microbeam [20] provide coordinates of receivers attached to the tongue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate whether possible biomechanical constraints related to type of word pair and speaking rate contribute to possible differences in variability in movement patterns, correlations between movement range values of target and timesynchronous non-target articulators in word pairs with alternating and identical onsets were calculated. Correlations have been used in other studies to investigate biomechanical constraints between articulators (e.g., Green and Wang, 2003;Stone et al, 2004). Specifically, it is argued that if the correlation between movement range values of simultaneous target and non-target articulations is high, the articulators are not moving independently from one another due to biomechanical constraints.…”
Section: B Current Studymentioning
confidence: 98%