2013
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00075.2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional role of left PMd and left M1 during preparation and execution of left hand movements in older adults

Abstract: Fujiyama H, Hinder MR, Summers JJ. Functional role of left PMd and left M1 during preparation and execution of left hand movements in older adults.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only in older adults, the wPLI value between PMd L –M1 L correlated positively with the wPLI value of PMd R –M1 L connection. This is in line with (Fujiyama, Hinder, & Summers, ) and suggests left hemisphere (PMd L ) to be involved in inhibitory processing related to impulse control. Moreover, the significant correlation between PMd L –M1 L and PMd R –M1 L indicates the effect of both ipsilateral and contralateral PMd on M1 L to control right hand movement only in older adults, which is in line with previous studies suggesting the involvement of both ipsilateral and contralateral PMd in the output from M1 in older adults (Fujiyama et al, ; Zimerman, Heise, Gerloff, Cohen, & Hummel, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Only in older adults, the wPLI value between PMd L –M1 L correlated positively with the wPLI value of PMd R –M1 L connection. This is in line with (Fujiyama, Hinder, & Summers, ) and suggests left hemisphere (PMd L ) to be involved in inhibitory processing related to impulse control. Moreover, the significant correlation between PMd L –M1 L and PMd R –M1 L indicates the effect of both ipsilateral and contralateral PMd on M1 L to control right hand movement only in older adults, which is in line with previous studies suggesting the involvement of both ipsilateral and contralateral PMd in the output from M1 in older adults (Fujiyama et al, ; Zimerman, Heise, Gerloff, Cohen, & Hummel, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We assumed that the capability to inhibit the ipsilateral M1 allows the brain to avoid potential disturbance from the M1, for elaborate control by the contralateral one [6]. This view seems to be compatible with our findings that ipsilateral M1 activity was correlated with deteriorated dexterity (Figure 3) and that the reduction of ipsilateral M1 activity was associated with dexterity improvement (Figure 4) in older adults, who may partially utilize the ipsilateral M1 when performing a motor task [43].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…4 ) and that the reduction of ipsilateral M1 activity was associated with dexterity improvement (Fig. 5 ) in older adults, who may partially utilize the ipsilateral M1 when performing a motor task 43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%