Functional responsibility for internal communication management and its integration in contemporary businesses

Abstract

Purpose Despite the proven link between internal communication and more effective business results, only a few attempts have been made to answer the essential question of who is responsible for managing internal communication in an organisation. This paper aims to examine the presence of internal communication management (ICM) practices in companies in Latvia and launch a new discussion on who should manage internal communication in a modern company to support business strategy and development. Design/methodology/approach In the first phase of the study, a survey was conducted in three business sectors in Latvia involved in managing and implementing the internal communications function. Using the multiple case study method, the second phase of the study examined in-depth, ICM and the implementation practices in four different Latvian companies. In total, 13 in-depth interviews were conducted within 4 companies, and thematic analysis was used to analyse the material gained from the interviews. Findings The target companies and relevant professionals from different fields have divergent opinions about who should manage the internal communication function. From the research across four companies, it was concluded that internal communication was implemented in a fragmented manner. There was a weak understanding of the meaning and goal of internal communication. The potential of effective internal communication in reaching strategic goals has not been realised. Responsibility for ICM is often limited to the reactive performance of public relations departments, human resources or marketing specialists. The companies clearly did not have a defined scope of responsibilities for managing internal communication amongst the different parts of their organisations. It can be concluded that company managers should pay attention to how internal communication is conducted, clearly delegate this function to a manager and define the expected results that meet the company’s strategic goals. The results of this research can be used to inform recommendations for integrating the ICM function. Originality/value Only a few research papers have discussed responsibility for internal communication functions. This research particularly fills this gap and emphasises the need to assign responsibility for an organisation’s ICM function as it is the core factor in strategic implementation and input related to business goals.

The social innovation profile in students as a transformation strategy: structural equation modeling

“…Effective communication is a vital competence in social entrepreneurship; thanks to it, ideas, resources, and communities can be connected (Suárez Brito et al, 2022), which implies transmitting clear messages, cultivating solid relationships, and generating trust for the long-term success of projects. Research related to communication and social entrepreneurship has been a recurring topic of study, in which communication is considered a fundamental competence to be developed in people and of relevance to be able to carry out activities, maintain positive interpersonal relationships, and achieve the objectives set (Nugroho et al, 2023;Tambunan et al, 2023;Zaumane and Leščevica, 2023). As for studies relating communication to variables such as entrepreneurial management, social value, leadership, and social innovation profile in the training of higher education students, studies are still limited.…”

Enterprise social media: a study from digital natives’ perspective

“…Currently, IC is a widely accepted and well-stablished feature of any modern organization (Mohamad, Nguyen, Melewar, & Gambetti, 2018). However, IC management in organizations remains neglected or underestimated (Emerald, 2022;Zaumane & Leščevica, 2021).…”

Mídias sociais corporativas: um estudo a partir da perspectiva dos nativos digitais

“…Atualmente, a CI é amplamente aceita e estabelecida em qualquer organização moderna (Mohamad et al, 2018). Entretanto, a gestão de CI nas organizações ainda é negligenciada ou subestimada (Emerald, 2022;Zaumane & Leščevica, 2021).…”