2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.83.155125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional renormalization for spontaneous symmetry breaking in the Hubbard model

Abstract: The phases with spontaneously broken symmetries corresponding to antiferromagnetic and d-wave superconducting order in the two-dimensional t − t -Hubbard model are investigated by means of the functional renormalization group. The introduction of composite boson fields in the magnetic, charge density, and superconducting channels allows an efficient parametrization of the four-fermion vertex and the study of regimes where either the antiferromagnetic or superconducting order parameter, or both, are nonzero. We… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, this value of doping is exactly identical to the one in the pure antiferromagnetic SDW phase discussed in last section, which suggests that the two symmetry-breaking phases are not competing so strongly at least in the present meanfield level. However, we should emphasize that if fluctuation beyond mean-field is included as shown in the typical fRG calculation [29], antiferromagnetic and superconducting order will show a tendency of mutual exclusion, which indicates a strong competition in contrast to the mean-field result. Another interesting point is that the maximal SC pairing order appears when the antiferromagnetic SDW just vanishes.…”
Section: Superconducting State With Antiferromagnetismmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Interestingly, this value of doping is exactly identical to the one in the pure antiferromagnetic SDW phase discussed in last section, which suggests that the two symmetry-breaking phases are not competing so strongly at least in the present meanfield level. However, we should emphasize that if fluctuation beyond mean-field is included as shown in the typical fRG calculation [29], antiferromagnetic and superconducting order will show a tendency of mutual exclusion, which indicates a strong competition in contrast to the mean-field result. Another interesting point is that the maximal SC pairing order appears when the antiferromagnetic SDW just vanishes.…”
Section: Superconducting State With Antiferromagnetismmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our method could be employed to study the pseudogap in the two dimensional Hubbard model [34][35][36][37]. Another application could be the examination of multicritical points, for which the Hubbard model provides a prominent example in the regime of competing d-wave and antiferromagnetic order [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a partially bosonized formulation, exchange propagators with a quadratic frequency dependence have been used. 27,28 In various further situations RG flows with frequencydependent vertices have been studied in some detail. In the case of the single-impurity Anderson model coupled to noninteracting leads, integration over the degrees of freedom in the leads produces an effective local model in which all dependence is in the frequency variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%