Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional relevance of resistance training-induced neuroplasticity in health and disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 198 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were inconsistent, as trained vs. untrained had lower coactivation only when antagonist hamstring activation was expressed relative to agonist quadriceps activation (pooled across three speeds, eight bins) but not when using the two other referencing schemes. While coactivation is interpreted as a hallmark of neural adaptations to RT due to motor learning, [3] there is no consensus as to how RT or other interventions modify agonist-referenced agonist-antagonist coactivation. After RT interventions, agonist-referenced agonist-antagonist coactivation decreased [10][11][12], did not change [13][14][15][16] or increased [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results were inconsistent, as trained vs. untrained had lower coactivation only when antagonist hamstring activation was expressed relative to agonist quadriceps activation (pooled across three speeds, eight bins) but not when using the two other referencing schemes. While coactivation is interpreted as a hallmark of neural adaptations to RT due to motor learning, [3] there is no consensus as to how RT or other interventions modify agonist-referenced agonist-antagonist coactivation. After RT interventions, agonist-referenced agonist-antagonist coactivation decreased [10][11][12], did not change [13][14][15][16] or increased [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a uniarticular exercise such as knee extension, quadriceps agonist activation dominates along with some coactivation of the antagonist hamstrings [1,2]. The repeated, forceful contractions during RT induce adaptations in the central nervous system, increasing the activation of the trained, agonist muscle when tested under high loads or resistance [3][4][5][6]. The nature and role of neural adaptation to RT in the antagonist muscle is paradoxical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance training also enhances neural activation and neuroplasticity that occurs at earlier stages of training program. These changes likely explain the initial functional adaptations and subsequent strength gains following resistance training program [31]. Moreover, resistance exercise can activate the effects of neurotrophin because it can increase brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression and its receptor tropomyosin receptor kinase B (trkB) [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study has shown that resistance training was superior at reducing HbA1C level to aerobic training [13]. Hence, the application of resistance training can be clinically significant because of the HbA1C lowering effects, the potential to lower the prevalence and progression of DSPN [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, a recent study with people with epilepsy has demonstrated that a combined aerobic and strength exercise program promoted beneficial effects on cognition (7). Although information concerning these beneficial effects has been observed after epilepsy has been established and considering the positive neuroplastic changes of exercise in animal (63,79) and human studies (80,81), previous strength exercise might also exert positive effects before brain insult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%