2017
DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2017.3.20170010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional recovery differences after stroke rehabilitation in patients with uni- or bilateral hemiparesis

Abstract: Objective:To examine the functional recovery differences after stroke rehabilitation in patients with uni- or bilateral hemiparesis.Methods:In this retrospective study, we included data from the medical record of all 383 patients with uni- or bilateral hemiparesis after stroke who were admitted to King Fahad Medical City-Rehabilitation Hospital between 2008 and 2014 in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. According to the site of hemiparesis, we classified patients into 3 groups: right hemiparesis (n=208), left he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, excluding this study, 143 and 123 participants had right and left sided hemiplegia, respectively. The affected side is an important prognostic indicator after stroke ( 39 ). In addition, some of the outcome measures used in the studies include electromyography for muscle activity (motor function), lower limb Fugl-Meyer for motor function, lower extremity motor activity log (LE-MAL) for real world use of the lower limb, Berg balance scale (BBS) for balance, the stroke specific quality of life questionnaire (SSQOL), and the stroke impact scale (SIS) for quality of life, the 10 m walk test (10MWT) for walking speed, the 6 min walk test (6MWT) for walking endurance, the motion analysis system for gait analysis, the timed up and go test (TUG) and Rivermead mobility index (RMI) for functional mobility, and the hard activity chart for exertion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, excluding this study, 143 and 123 participants had right and left sided hemiplegia, respectively. The affected side is an important prognostic indicator after stroke ( 39 ). In addition, some of the outcome measures used in the studies include electromyography for muscle activity (motor function), lower limb Fugl-Meyer for motor function, lower extremity motor activity log (LE-MAL) for real world use of the lower limb, Berg balance scale (BBS) for balance, the stroke specific quality of life questionnaire (SSQOL), and the stroke impact scale (SIS) for quality of life, the 10 m walk test (10MWT) for walking speed, the 6 min walk test (6MWT) for walking endurance, the motion analysis system for gait analysis, the timed up and go test (TUG) and Rivermead mobility index (RMI) for functional mobility, and the hard activity chart for exertion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This symptom was reported up to 65% of stroke patient. 24 Hemiplegia as the utmost stand out symptoms not only affect in limb activity but also has it effects on trunk muscle function both sides of the body affecting the proximal stabilization that eventually will influence the mobility of the distal part. 25,27 The trunk dysfunction in post stroke patient has been demonstrated in many studies.…”
Section: Stroke Impact On Postural Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the study of Sackley et al ( 2008 ) that was conducted over a year after stroke, the prevalent types of complication experienced were falls (73%), contractures (60%), pain (55%), shoulder pain (52%), emotional distress (50%), and pressure sores (22%) (Sackley et al, 2008 ). Moreover, hemiparesis and hemiplegia are frequent and widely recognized impairments of stroke where they affect over 65% of stroke survivors (Bindawas et al, 2017 ). Following this cerebrovascular accident, the ability to perform daily life activities is greatly affected by physical disability, essentially upper extremities involvement, and cognitive impairment fluctuating between minor vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) and vascular dementia (VaD) (Arauz et al, 2014 ; Kwakkel et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%