2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-003-7108-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Reconstruction of the Oral Cavity

Abstract: Reconstruction of the oral cavity is an intricate subject that reflects the complexity of the oral cavity itself. There is no perfect reconstruction. Presented here are the current optimal choices for the various regions within the oral cavity. We are constantly seeking to improve these reconstructions in an effort to restore optimal function to patients unfortunate enough to require surgical excision of this most elaborate of anatomic structures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In assessing the treatment strategy, surgeons should attempt to gain the best loco‐regional control rate with due consideration to the potential impact of such procedures on speech, swallowing, and cosmetic outcomes. Immediate reconstruction should be performed after primary tumor resection and its extent, together with the tongue subsite involved, influences the severity of the subsequent functional impairment …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In assessing the treatment strategy, surgeons should attempt to gain the best loco‐regional control rate with due consideration to the potential impact of such procedures on speech, swallowing, and cosmetic outcomes. Immediate reconstruction should be performed after primary tumor resection and its extent, together with the tongue subsite involved, influences the severity of the subsequent functional impairment …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disa found that most defects can be reconstructed with jejunum, rectus, forearm and fibula flap [42]. Neligan postulated that 2 flaps are sufficient for most intraoral reconstructions: radial forearm flap for restoration of the intraoral lining [34], and the fibula osteocutaneous flap for mandible reconstruction, as it provides a good quality and quantity bone stock with a reliable skin paddle [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many efforts are undertaken by surgeons to limit the degree of anatomical deformities during surgical resections of neoplasms, minor preprosthetic correction of the soft tissue may be helpful in some cases (like the one here presented) to eliminate unacceptable interferences of residual scar tissue with the prosthesis. The reconstruction of oral cavity defects always represents a difficult challenge depending on disease staging and patient condition [8]. Due to this unique and complex three-dimensional anatomical environment, the outcomes of reconstructive procedures are often a compromise that implies functional morbidity and, furthermore, may limit the possibility of an adequate prosthetic rehabilitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%