2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3_55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Reconstruction of Dyadic and Triadic Subgraphs in Spiking Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is witnessed that Artificial Neural Network models have the lowest mean-square-error value compared to the statistical models (Moghaddam et al, 2011). Bayata et al (2011), Akin et al (2017), Moghaddam et al (2011), andChiou (2006) used Artificial Neural Networks to model crashes and identified crash-related factors. Chang (2005) employed an Artificial Neural Network model and a negative-binomial model to analyze crash data.…”
Section: Low Sample Mean and Small Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is witnessed that Artificial Neural Network models have the lowest mean-square-error value compared to the statistical models (Moghaddam et al, 2011). Bayata et al (2011), Akin et al (2017), Moghaddam et al (2011), andChiou (2006) used Artificial Neural Networks to model crashes and identified crash-related factors. Chang (2005) employed an Artificial Neural Network model and a negative-binomial model to analyze crash data.…”
Section: Low Sample Mean and Small Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%