1990
DOI: 10.1093/geronj/45.6.m192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Reach: A New Clinical Measure of Balance

Abstract: A new clinically accessible measure of balance, functional reach (FR), is the difference between arm's length and maximal forward reach, using a fixed base of support. The purposes of this study were to (a) establish FR as a measure of the margin of stability versus the laboratory measure, center of pressure excursion (COPE); (b) test reliability and precision, and (c) determine factors that influence FR, including age and anthropometrics. We evaluated FR in 128 volunteers (age 21-87 years). FR was determined … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

44
1,509
12
119

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,358 publications
(1,732 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
44
1,509
12
119
Order By: Relevance
“…Posturography assessments were performed barefoot, keeping the feet 20 cm apart in the WBB-based posturography system and placing their feet with the heels together and the toes separated, thus forming a V-shape, in the NedSVE/IBV system, as specified in the manual. Clinical instruments included the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) [17], the Functional Reach Test (FRT) [2], the Step Test with the paretic (STp) and non-paretic leg (STnp) [18], the 30 second Chair-to-Stand Test (30CST) [19], the Timed "Up-and-go" Test (TUG) [20], the Timed Up and Down Stair Test (TUDST) [21], and the 10 Meter Walking Test (10MWT) [22]. All assessments took place within five days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Posturography assessments were performed barefoot, keeping the feet 20 cm apart in the WBB-based posturography system and placing their feet with the heels together and the toes separated, thus forming a V-shape, in the NedSVE/IBV system, as specified in the manual. Clinical instruments included the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) [17], the Functional Reach Test (FRT) [2], the Step Test with the paretic (STp) and non-paretic leg (STnp) [18], the 30 second Chair-to-Stand Test (30CST) [19], the Timed "Up-and-go" Test (TUG) [20], the Timed Up and Down Stair Test (TUDST) [21], and the 10 Meter Walking Test (10MWT) [22]. All assessments took place within five days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severity of balance deficits have been traditionally assessed using clinical scales [2], which are usually easy to administer in the clinic and not time-consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this procedure, the participant was asked to attempt to reach an object in front of him/her without stepping forward or making use of any compensation strategy. The distance covered was measured; distances under 15cm indicate frailty and risk of falls 17 .…”
Section: Functional Reach Test (Frt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the participants were instructed to reach forward as far as possible without taking a step. The difference between the start and end position of the right upper limb was measured [22].…”
Section: Functional Reach Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FrT was developed to evaluate the maximum limits of stability in stance [22]. The maximal distance one can reach forward during the test is considered an accurate predictor for fall risk [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%