2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.06.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Prognostic value of optical coherence tomography in optic chiasmal decompression: A preliminary study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,43 For FD-OCT machines, Yoo et al 56 reported a preoperative cut-off value of 81 µm for pRNFL thickness using Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering) for predicting good visual recovery. Two other FD-OCT studies performed on Cirrus OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec) reported preoperative cut-off values of 75 µm for average pRNFL thickness, 60 58 µm for temporal pRNFL thickness, 61 and 67 µm for mGCIPL thickness. 60 Moon and Shin 54 reported preoperative cut-off values of 23.6 µm for mRNFL thickness, 30.6 µm for RGC layer thickness, and 28.9 µm for IPL thickness on Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering).…”
Section: Oct Imaging As a Prognostic Factor For Visual Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…10,43 For FD-OCT machines, Yoo et al 56 reported a preoperative cut-off value of 81 µm for pRNFL thickness using Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering) for predicting good visual recovery. Two other FD-OCT studies performed on Cirrus OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec) reported preoperative cut-off values of 75 µm for average pRNFL thickness, 60 58 µm for temporal pRNFL thickness, 61 and 67 µm for mGCIPL thickness. 60 Moon and Shin 54 reported preoperative cut-off values of 23.6 µm for mRNFL thickness, 30.6 µm for RGC layer thickness, and 28.9 µm for IPL thickness on Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering).…”
Section: Oct Imaging As a Prognostic Factor For Visual Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…43,[46][47][48][49]52,55,61 Similarly, patients with mGCIPL loss before decompression have worse postoperative VFs, compared with those without mGCIPL loss. 51,56,57,59,60 While preoperative "cut-off values" of OCT parameters would be useful for prognostication of postoperative visual recovery, they are currently limited because of variation in values by machine manufacturer and cannot be applied across machines, even if they use the same OCT technology (eg, SD-OCT). For TD-OCT devices, preoperative average pRNFL thickness below 75 to 80 µm was associated with worse visual outcomes.…”
Section: Oct Imaging As a Prognostic Factor For Visual Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation