2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional profiles of school refusal behavior and their relationship with depression, anxiety, and stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
59
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
13
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, this study is framed within a new perspective that seeks to identify which factors act as protectors of school refusal behavior. The negative to attend school has been commonly associated with internalizing problems such as anxiety or depression (Heyne et al, 2011; Richards and Hadwin, 2011; Gonzálvez et al, 2018a,b), externalizing problems such as disruptive behaviors (Egger et al, 2003; Maynard et al, 2012) and low academic performance (Barry et al, 2010; Yahaya et al, 2010; Thornton et al, 2013). From these data, the interest in detecting those variables that negatively affect students who refuse or show difficulties to attend school is evident.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, this study is framed within a new perspective that seeks to identify which factors act as protectors of school refusal behavior. The negative to attend school has been commonly associated with internalizing problems such as anxiety or depression (Heyne et al, 2011; Richards and Hadwin, 2011; Gonzálvez et al, 2018a,b), externalizing problems such as disruptive behaviors (Egger et al, 2003; Maynard et al, 2012) and low academic performance (Barry et al, 2010; Yahaya et al, 2010; Thornton et al, 2013). From these data, the interest in detecting those variables that negatively affect students who refuse or show difficulties to attend school is evident.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, most of the studies that have analyzed the relationship between school refusal and different personality traits and emotional states have chosen variables that fundamentally have a negative impact on school attendance problems. The findings of these studies reveal that school refusal is associated with higher scores in anxiety (Kearney and Albano, 2004; Gonzálvez et al, 2018a), depression (Egger et al, 2003; Gonzálvez et al, 2018b) or pessimism (Gonzálvez et al, 2018c). However, this work pretends to analyze the impact of a variable, social functioning, whose high levels are expected to have a positive effect and lead to lower school refusal rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, school withdrawal at the period of junior high school has been reported to be related to communication skills in school settings among the student group in the transitional phase of adjustment to junior high school, and school absenteeism has been attributed to school-life skills, including communication skills [ 32 ]. Moreover, aggression toward peers has been reported as a potential predictor of school withdrawal [ 10 ]. However, the current study revealed no significant relationship among children with scores below 39 points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous studies reported that a range of problems among children, including physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and living environment, are all related to difficulties at school, as measured by absenteeism [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Various lifestyle factors and school-related variables are reported to be associated with absenteeism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the first two conditions refer to school refusal behavior based on negative reinforcement or the avoidance of aversive situations, whereas the latter two conditions refer to school refusal behavior that is based on positive reinforcement or obtaining something positive outside the school (Kearney, 2002). This functional classification system has considerable advantages, such as a greater ability to distinguish between the different causes of SRB with and without anxious symptomatology (Gonzálvez et al, 2018; Sanmartín et al, 2018), and therefore, an increased specification and efficiency in the implementation of intervention strategies for each student.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%