2000
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional overlap of sequences that activate transcription and signal ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis

Abstract: Many transcription factors, particularly those involved in the control of cell growth, are unstable proteins destroyed by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. In a previous study of sequences targeting the transcription factor Myc for destruction, we observed that the region in Myc signaling ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis overlaps closely with the region in Myc that activates transcription. Here, we present evidence that the overlap of these two activities is not unique to Myc, but reflects a more general phenomeno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
183
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
8
183
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, structural predictions obtained with different algorithms reveal that the C-terminal region of ERM may be unstructured or only slightly structured. In some unstable transcription factors, investigators report an overlap between sequences that activate transcription and those that signal degradation, so that the transcriptional activity of these proteins is coupled to their proteolytic destruction (Molinari et al, 1999;Salghetti et al, 2000;Muratani and Tansey, 2003). In ERM, likewise, deletion of the C-terminal domain previously characterized as a transactivation domain (TAD) (Laget et al, 1996) affects both the ability to transactivate and the rate of degradation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, structural predictions obtained with different algorithms reveal that the C-terminal region of ERM may be unstructured or only slightly structured. In some unstable transcription factors, investigators report an overlap between sequences that activate transcription and those that signal degradation, so that the transcriptional activity of these proteins is coupled to their proteolytic destruction (Molinari et al, 1999;Salghetti et al, 2000;Muratani and Tansey, 2003). In ERM, likewise, deletion of the C-terminal domain previously characterized as a transactivation domain (TAD) (Laget et al, 1996) affects both the ability to transactivate and the rate of degradation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many examples of unstable transcription factors in which there is overlap between TAD and degron sequences (Salghetti et al, 2000;Muratani and Tansey, 2003). Such overlap is thought to contribute to the coupling of the activity of transcription factors with their proteasome-mediated destruction and various models have been proposed to describe how activator degradation might limit or stimulate transcription (Salghetti et al, 2000;Lipford and Deshaies, 2003;Muratani and Tansey, 2003;Lipford et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such overlap is thought to contribute to the coupling of the activity of transcription factors with their proteasome-mediated destruction and various models have been proposed to describe how activator degradation might limit or stimulate transcription (Salghetti et al, 2000;Lipford and Deshaies, 2003;Muratani and Tansey, 2003;Lipford et al, 2005). Thus, degradation might function to limit how long any single activator remains bound at a promoter, facilitating reprogramming of transcriptional patterns, or it might be required to remove spent activators that would otherwise block continued initiation of transcription.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another signal for degradation is the transcription activation domain (TAD) itself. It has been reported that VP16 and several other unstable transcription factors such as E2F-1, Jun, Myc, p53, Fos and GCN4 have overlapping TADs and degron signals (60). It has been demonstrated that increasing the number of TADs decreases the half-life of the protein.…”
Section: Ubiquitin-proteasome Pathway and Nhr Transcriptional Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%