2014
DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2014.948067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional outcomes of community-based brain injury rehabilitation clients

Abstract: The data support the need for continuity of care, including ongoing emotional support, to cater to the complex and dynamic needs of the ABI population. However, these results need to be considered in the context of a small sample size and quasi-experimental design.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Patient’s performance on measures of neurodisability, essentially participants’ Abilities and Adjustment to brain injury showed the most consistent improvements over time for the cohort. Using the MPAI-4’s standardized T scores for the total scale, the difference in T scores from induction to rehabilitation to 1.5 years follow-up was broadly similar to recent published work on comprehensive community rehabilitation for longer term cases ( Altman et al, 2010 ; Curran et al, 2014 ), and indeed the difference in T scores in the current study approaches that recently published for people with duration of ABI of more than 1 year ( Altman et al, 2013 ). This suggests a robust improvement across time on this measure in the context of people in continuing service in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Patient’s performance on measures of neurodisability, essentially participants’ Abilities and Adjustment to brain injury showed the most consistent improvements over time for the cohort. Using the MPAI-4’s standardized T scores for the total scale, the difference in T scores from induction to rehabilitation to 1.5 years follow-up was broadly similar to recent published work on comprehensive community rehabilitation for longer term cases ( Altman et al, 2010 ; Curran et al, 2014 ), and indeed the difference in T scores in the current study approaches that recently published for people with duration of ABI of more than 1 year ( Altman et al, 2013 ). This suggests a robust improvement across time on this measure in the context of people in continuing service in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The relatively young age and predominantly male cohort is consistent with other profiles of individuals seeking ABI services. 13–15 The majority of the cohort was born in Australia (64.7%), with 3.4% of clients of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander background. Most of the cohort lived in a major city (84.3%) and were between average disadvantage and least disadvantaged levels of the Socio-Economic Index for Areas Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage before admission (72.3%).…”
Section: Findings To Datementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of community-based neurorehabilitation cohort studies examining the outcomes of individuals with ABI after rehabilitation exist in Australia. 13–16 Two of these studies involved retrospective analysis of client data at discharge from community-based brain injury services in which individualised rehabilitation care was provided. The first study showed that ABI clients (n=63) who received rehabilitation services in Queensland between 2017 and 2018 had significantly improved physical outcomes compared with an historical ABI cohort who did not receive rehabilitation services between 2007 and 2009 (n=124).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations