2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Outcomes in Traumatic Disorders of Consciousness: 5-Year Outcomes From the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the individuals classified as non-command following at the time for rehabilitation admission progressed as expected to a higher level of function prior to discharge. 32,33 The medical status of the non-command following is highly complex. There are many reasons why an individual may lack command following after TBI (e.g., concurrent anoxic insult, impaired arousal, apraxia, and aphasia).…”
Section: Study Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the individuals classified as non-command following at the time for rehabilitation admission progressed as expected to a higher level of function prior to discharge. 32,33 The medical status of the non-command following is highly complex. There are many reasons why an individual may lack command following after TBI (e.g., concurrent anoxic insult, impaired arousal, apraxia, and aphasia).…”
Section: Study Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 However, the point at which connectivity profiles are stabilized has yet to be identified, and it is plausible that connectivity alterations evident early after injury might endure beyond a critical early window of clinical recovery, typically regarded as the first year postinjury. [34][35][36][37] In the present investigation, we probed longitudinal connectivity changes in a subset of individuals from our TBI group, comparing connectivity profiles derived from rs-fMRI in the subacute phase (approximately 3 months postinjury) to those in the chronic phase. Our aim was to outline the developmental trajectory of any identified changes between the TBI and HC groups, as well as to examine whether functional connectivity changes during the chronic phase are gradually evolving phenomena or if they are relatively more immediate effects of brain injury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Furthermore, clinically meaningful change in NBF may have prognostic value by quantifying the likelihood and magnitude of long-term functional recovery. 4,20 In addition, such information is important for research planning. For example, computing sample size for a clinical trial requires an estimate of the size of the treatment effect that might be reasonable, meaningful, and clinically relevant.…”
Section: S Evere Acquired Brain Injury (Bi) Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 While some persons recover full consciousness quickly, others evolve into vegetative (VS) or minimally conscious states (MCS), which may be transient or prolonged conditions. [2][3][4] Neurorehabilitation for persons in states of severely impaired consciousness (SIC) focuses on optimizing recovery through clinical management [5][6][7][8][9] and on the provision of therapeutic rehabilitation interventions. 10 The current standard for evaluating change in neurobehavioral function (NBF) is via clinical observation of behavior in response to sensory stimuli, 9,11 although measures of neural responsivity that may detect prebehavioral changes are being examined for reliability (eg, functional imaging, P300, positron emission tomography, electroencephalography).…”
Section: S Evere Acquired Brain Injury (Bi) Ismentioning
confidence: 99%