2002
DOI: 10.1097/00024720-200210000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Outcome Study of Patients After Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Effects of Concomitant Pathology

Abstract: The aim of this study is to identify factors associated with poor outcome in the medium (2-5 years) postoperative period following lumbar stenosis surgery. Fifty-six consecutive patients who underwent decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis were retrospectively analyzed using chart and radiologic review, questionnaire using American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeon's MODEM questionnaire containing disability, symptoms, and illness rating, as well as Short Form-36 questionnaires. Postoperatively, there was 9… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In part, it is difficult to compare the results from the Tashjian et al 21 study and our study with the above-mentioned studies because of the differences 12,19 in how comorbidity was assessed. For example, Katz et al 12 utilized the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, which rates the severity of comorbid illness in the 13 organ systems on a scale of 0 to 4 points, Tashjian et al 21 and Modifi et al 19 used the MODEMS (Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System), and we used a total number of comorbidities from a list of 9 most frequently noted illnesses in our population. Maybe the impact on functional outcome and levels of disability is contingent on the presence of certain comorbidities and not of others.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In part, it is difficult to compare the results from the Tashjian et al 21 study and our study with the above-mentioned studies because of the differences 12,19 in how comorbidity was assessed. For example, Katz et al 12 utilized the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, which rates the severity of comorbid illness in the 13 organ systems on a scale of 0 to 4 points, Tashjian et al 21 and Modifi et al 19 used the MODEMS (Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System), and we used a total number of comorbidities from a list of 9 most frequently noted illnesses in our population. Maybe the impact on functional outcome and levels of disability is contingent on the presence of certain comorbidities and not of others.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 69%
“…Cardiovascular and chronic pulmonary diseases, osteoarthrosis, and rheumatoid arthritis were the most frequently noted comorbid conditions. Mofidi et al 19 also noted an association of poor outcome and coexisting medical conditions after surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. In fact, the presence of comorbid conditions had the strongest correlation with poor symptomatic and functional outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clinical assessment involved the measurement of the 10-point visual analog back pain score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for back pain, and SF 12 Health Survey. All comorbidities were matched between the patients to reduce error in outcome measurement [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%