Abstract:Nonoperative management of thoracolumbar burst fractures with hyperextension casting or bracing was proven to be a safe and effective method of treatment in selected patients. Clinical results were favorable; no neurologic deterioration was observed; hospitalization times were minimized, and patient satisfaction was high. The authors do not believe that ligamentous injury of the posterior column is a contraindication to nonoperative management of thoracolumbar burst fractures.
“…Conservative treatment of stable vertebral fractures has been successfully proposed by many authors [7][8][9][10][11], with bed rest followed by external orthoses, extension gymnastic, plaster jacket in bed or stand reduction [12]. These treatments should be continued for a period of at least 3-4 months during which patient care and cooperation are essential.…”
Purpose We propose to evaluate the complication rate in minimally invasive stabilization (MIS) for spine fractures and tumors, as a common alternative to open fusion and conservative treatment. Methods From 2000 to 2010, 187 patients were treated by minimally invasive percutaneous fixation in 133 traumatic fractures and 54 primitive and/or secondary spine tumors. Complications were classified, according to the period of onset as intraoperative and postoperative, and according to the severity, as major and minor. Results A total of 15 complications (8 %) were recorded: 5 intraoperative (3 %), 6 early postoperative (3 %) and 4 late postoperative (2 %); 6 were minor complications (3 %) and 9 were major complications (5 %). Conclusions Minimally invasive stabilization of selected spine pathologies appears to be a safe technique with low complication rate and high patient satisfaction. MIS reduces hospitalization and allows a fast functional recovery improving the quality of life.
“…Conservative treatment of stable vertebral fractures has been successfully proposed by many authors [7][8][9][10][11], with bed rest followed by external orthoses, extension gymnastic, plaster jacket in bed or stand reduction [12]. These treatments should be continued for a period of at least 3-4 months during which patient care and cooperation are essential.…”
Purpose We propose to evaluate the complication rate in minimally invasive stabilization (MIS) for spine fractures and tumors, as a common alternative to open fusion and conservative treatment. Methods From 2000 to 2010, 187 patients were treated by minimally invasive percutaneous fixation in 133 traumatic fractures and 54 primitive and/or secondary spine tumors. Complications were classified, according to the period of onset as intraoperative and postoperative, and according to the severity, as major and minor. Results A total of 15 complications (8 %) were recorded: 5 intraoperative (3 %), 6 early postoperative (3 %) and 4 late postoperative (2 %); 6 were minor complications (3 %) and 9 were major complications (5 %). Conclusions Minimally invasive stabilization of selected spine pathologies appears to be a safe technique with low complication rate and high patient satisfaction. MIS reduces hospitalization and allows a fast functional recovery improving the quality of life.
“…Patients with such fractures may be treated with either nonoperative or operative modalities. Nonoperative treatment may include the use of a brace, cast, bed rest, and analgesics [7,11,12,14,34,46,47]. Operative treatment usually involves instrumented intervertebral fusion, with or without spinal decompression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have been observational, and although several relevant trials have been published, sample sizes have been small, ranging from 10 to 80 patients [1-5, 9-14, 27, 34, 41, 42, 44, 49]. Proponents of nonoperative management argue that avoiding surgery decreases associated costs and surgical complications including infection, hardware-related complications, and iatrogenic injury [11,12,14,34,38,44]. Indications for operative treatment may include neurologic deficit, unstable fracture, severe kyphosis greater than 35°, canal compromise greater than 50%, or posterior ligamentous complex injury [18,38].…”
Background Decision-making regarding nonoperative versus operative treatment of patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures in the absence of neurologic deficits is controversial. Lack of evidence-based practice may result in patients being treated inappropriately and being exposed to unnecessary adverse consequences.
“…Esses instrumentos são validados para uso em nosso meio e de grande valor para análise do resultado do tratamento centrado no paciente, e não apenas com base em critérios radiográ-ficos. De forma similar aos nossos achados, houve falta de correlação evidente entre a cifose e sintomatologia ou função na coluna após o tratamento conservador nas séries de casos levantadas (16,22,23) . Para comparar com nossos achados de 86,1% de retorno às atividades laborativas, Mumford et al (23) , em seu estudo prospectivo de 41 pacientes tratados de modo conservador, acompanhados por dois anos em média, verificaram que 90,3% deles retornaram ao seu trabalho.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.