2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional outcome following endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal humerus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
105
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(31 reference statements)
6
105
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In these cases, soft-tissue reattachment is especially important to prevent future dislocations. 7,20,[48][49][50] Other materials and techniques are currently being investigated to improve soft-tissue integration. 16,[25][26][27][28]36,[38][39][40]67 In the proximal tibia, the gastrocnemius fl ap can be reinforced using various materials such as artifi cial acrylic meshes (eg, Lars, Trevira) or other biologically derived devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In these cases, soft-tissue reattachment is especially important to prevent future dislocations. 7,20,[48][49][50] Other materials and techniques are currently being investigated to improve soft-tissue integration. 16,[25][26][27][28]36,[38][39][40]67 In the proximal tibia, the gastrocnemius fl ap can be reinforced using various materials such as artifi cial acrylic meshes (eg, Lars, Trevira) or other biologically derived devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57,[98][99][100] Aseptic loosening (type II failure) is a frequent mechanical complication in megaprosthetic reconstructions of long bones after tumor resection. [46][47][48][49]52 Aseptic loosening of the stem is the most prominent and variably reported complication in the literature, with an incidence ranging from 3% to 27%. 38,46,49,64,91,92,101 The mode of stem fi xation, cemented vs uncemented, is of remarkable importance, and currently there is no clear distinction in outcomes between the two.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The clinical outcome, local recurrence, and survival rates after limb-preserving and other procedures seem to be comparable [9][10][11]. To provide a platform for elbow and hand function, reconstructive limb-preserving procedures have been proposed for the proximal humerus [12]. Moreover, patient acceptance has been described as higher for limb-preserving treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%