Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch

Hida, Jin‐ichi; Yasutomi, Masayuki; Fujimoto, Kiyoshige; Okuno, Kiyotaka; Ieda, Shintarou; Machidera, Norikazu; Kubo, Rieko; Shindo, Katsuhisa; Koh, Kenzo

doi:10.1007/bf02054686

Cited by 191 publications

(98 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Bei Anlage eines J-Pouches sollte zur Vermeidung von Entleerungsproblemen die Schenkellänge nicht über 6 cm liegen [750]. Die einzige grö-ßere prospektiv randomisierte Studie zur Frage des differenziellen Einsatzes verschiedener Rekonstruktionen [747] [748].…”

Section: Level Of Evidence 2aunclassified

S3-Leitlinie – Kolorektales Karzinom

Schmiegel

Buchberger

Follmann³

et al. 2017

Z Gastroenterol

148

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Level Of Evidence 2aunclassified

S3-Leitlinie – Kolorektales Karzinom

Schmiegel

Buchberger

Follmann³

et al. 2017

Z Gastroenterol

148

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…There was some sacrifice in reservoir capacity, but a significantly better ability to evacuate. 90 The long-term function of pouches remains to be fully assessed.…”

Section: The Role Of Colonic Pouches After Elective Anterior Resectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing colorectal cancer treatment and survival for Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal people in New South Wales

Weir

Supramaniam

Gibberd

et al. 2016

Medical Journal of Australia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Our aim was to compare surgical treatment rates and survival rates for Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal people in New South Wales with colorectal cancer, and to describe the medical treatment received by a sample of Aboriginal people with colorectal cancer. Design, setting and participants: All people diagnosed with colorectal cancer in NSW during 2001–2007 were identified and their cancer registry records linked to hospital admissions data and death records. A medical records audit of a sample of Aboriginal people diagnosed with colorectal cancer during 2000–2011 was also conducted. Main outcome measures: Cause‐specific survival, odds of surgical treatment, and the proportions of people receiving adjuvant treatments. Results: Of 29 777 eligible colorectal cancer cases, 278 (0.9%) involved Aboriginal people. Similar proportions of Aboriginal (76%) and non‐Aboriginal (79%) people had undergone surgical treatment. Colorectal cancer‐specific survival was similar for Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal people up to 18 months after diagnosis, but 5 years post‐diagnosis the risk of death for Aboriginal people who had had surgical treatment was 68% higher than for non‐Aboriginal people (adjusted hazards ratio, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.32–2.09). Of 145 Aboriginal people with colorectal cancer identified by the medical records audit, 117 (81%) had undergone surgery, and 56 (48%) had also received adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Conclusions: Aboriginal people with colorectal cancer had poorer survival rates than non‐Aboriginal people, although rates of surgical treatment, complications and follow‐up colonoscopy were similar. More work is needed to identify and understand why outcomes for Aboriginal people with colorectal cancer are different from those of other New South Wales residents.

show abstract

“…In 11 out of 12 controlled studies (5,40,43,52,54,64,49,102,143,160,162), compliance was higher in the pouch group than in the group with straight colorectal or coloanal anastomosis, in 9 studies significantly so. In 8 studies (32,50,64,82,88,123,160,162) SV was lower in the group without pouch, the majority significantly so compared with the pouch group. The studies on volumetric parameters confirm the better reservoir function of the pouch compared with straight coloanal or colorectal anastomosis.…”

Section: Colon J Pouch (Cjp)mentioning

confidence: 95%

“…In most studies the patients were examined one year post-operatively. In a randomized trial comparing 5cm and 10 cm long pouches, a significantly lower MTV was established with the smaller pouch, so that it can be assumed that the MTV is dependent on pouch volume (50). In 11 out of 12 controlled studies (5,40,43,52,54,64,49,102,143,160,162), compliance was higher in the pouch group than in the group with straight colorectal or coloanal anastomosis, in 9 studies significantly so.…”

Section: Colon J Pouch (Cjp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Causes and Prevention of Functional Disturbances Following Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

Gross¹

2011

Rectal Cancer - A Multidisciplinary Approach to Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch

Abstract: The 5-cm J-pouch conferred adequate reservoir function without compromising evacuation.

Cited by 191 publications

References 13 publications

S3-Leitlinie – Kolorektales Karzinom

S3-Leitlinie – Kolorektales Karzinom

Comparing colorectal cancer treatment and survival for Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal people in New South Wales

Causes and Prevention of Functional Disturbances Following Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About