1982
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(82)81065-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional non‐identity of creatine kinase subunits of rabbit skeletal muscle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between the N-termini conformational asymmetry to the observed subunit binding asymmetry are unknown, although it was recently proposed that the N-terminal regions play a role in active site communication and catalytic regulation (17). The structural asymmetry supports the view that the CK subunits exhibit negative cooperativity (22-25), whereas other chemical modification experiments and data from deuterium exchange experiments contradict the notion of negative cooperativity in CK (26, 27). The two distinct alternative spliced GK N-termini imply an inherently asymmetric structure, which is confirmed by the crystal structures of both the homodimeric GKββ and the heterodimeric GKαβ reported here.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…The relationship between the N-termini conformational asymmetry to the observed subunit binding asymmetry are unknown, although it was recently proposed that the N-terminal regions play a role in active site communication and catalytic regulation (17). The structural asymmetry supports the view that the CK subunits exhibit negative cooperativity (22-25), whereas other chemical modification experiments and data from deuterium exchange experiments contradict the notion of negative cooperativity in CK (26, 27). The two distinct alternative spliced GK N-termini imply an inherently asymmetric structure, which is confirmed by the crystal structures of both the homodimeric GKββ and the heterodimeric GKαβ reported here.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…tRNA was prepared according to [10]. Oxidation of tRNA was carried out as previously described [13]. tRNA(-1), tRNA(-2) and tRNA(-3) were prepared by subjecting tRNA to three reaction cycles of the Whitfield degradation according to Paulsen and Wintermeier [14] and purified using reverse phase chromatography [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous work, chemical modifications of this cysteine’s thiol generally either decrease the activity of CK or inactivate the enzyme completely. Additionally, several thiol-modifying reagents differentially modify one of the two active sites of the dimer, thus strongly suggesting that there is an intrinsic dimeric asymmetry that extends to the reactivity of the two thiols. Measured enzymatic activity was decreased but not abolished upon mutation of Cys283 to either glycine, serine, alanine, asparagine, or aspartate; therefore, the Cys283 residue in rmCK (or the homologous Cys in other CK’s) is apparently optimal but not essential for catalysis or substrate binding. It was suggested that the cysteine residue might play a vital role in synergistic substrate binding, in which the binding of the first substrate (i.e., ATP) allows additional substrates (i.e., creatine) to bind with greater affinity to the CK active site before the reaction proceeds .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%