“…This theoretical interest has been accompanied by an upsurge of psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic studies on sign language processing in different labs around the world, thus contributing to a deeper level of understanding of the human capacity for language. These studies have revealed important similarities and differences between modalities with regard to both psychological processes (Gutiérrez, Müller, Baus, & Carreiras, 2012;Gutiérrez, Williams, Grosvald, & Corina, 2012;Hosemann, Herrmann, Sennhenn-Reulen, Schlesewsky, & Steinbach, 2018;Vinson, Thompson, Skinner, Fox, & Vigliocco, 2010) and the underlying neural representation (Emmorey, 2015;MacSweeney, Capek, Campbell, & Woll, 2008;Trettenbrein, Papitto, Friederici, & Zaccarella, 2021). Reaction time studies, eye tracking experiments, and electroencephalography investigations of spoken and written and, more recently, sign language processing have underlined the importance of controlling for lexical variables such as frequency and age of acquisition (AoA) in psycholinguistic experiments.…”