2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-68044-4_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional MRI Limitations and Aspirations

Abstract: PrefaceThe idea of the present book emerged on the island of Elba in the summer of 2006 during an enjoyable and very fruitful workshop on thinking with the participation of most of the contributors of the present volume.The main intention behind the book is to address thinking by surveying the contribution of various functional neuroimaging methods to our understanding of the neural underpinnings of thinking. The major focus is on the methods applicable to the neurobiological study of human thinking, since muc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare the widespread eccentricity connectivity with other models of connectivity, each hemifield map was separated into six divisions of eccentricity, each containing six divisions of polar angle, yielding a total of 36 bins for each hemifield representation. Two spatial patterns of topographically local connectivity and two patterns of topographically widespread connectivity were generated: A. Topographically local connectivity: Instrumental ‘noise’ connectivity (NSE): subject-specific predicted ‘noise’ correlations that are assumed to be non-neuronal in nature, and could result from any biases introduced from data acquisition and analyses, as well as the intrinsic spatial signal spread in the BOLD imaging ( Bandettini, 2009 ). The point spread function at 3T has been estimated to be about 3.5 mm ( Engel et al, 1997 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the widespread eccentricity connectivity with other models of connectivity, each hemifield map was separated into six divisions of eccentricity, each containing six divisions of polar angle, yielding a total of 36 bins for each hemifield representation. Two spatial patterns of topographically local connectivity and two patterns of topographically widespread connectivity were generated: A. Topographically local connectivity: Instrumental ‘noise’ connectivity (NSE): subject-specific predicted ‘noise’ correlations that are assumed to be non-neuronal in nature, and could result from any biases introduced from data acquisition and analyses, as well as the intrinsic spatial signal spread in the BOLD imaging ( Bandettini, 2009 ). The point spread function at 3T has been estimated to be about 3.5 mm ( Engel et al, 1997 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to primary limitations including a low signal or contrast to noise ratio and the questionable validity of BOLD signal as a measure of neuronal activity. Unexplained variability in this signal might result from hemodynamic factors that are not controlled for [78]. …”
Section: Functional Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the existence of this paramagnetic reporter of oxygen metabolism is fortuitous, the data it provides is only an indirect readout of neural activity (Logothetis, 2008; Sirotin and Das, 2009; Jukovskaya et al, 2011), which is limited in its spatial and temporal resolution to the dynamics of blood flow in the brain's capillary network (1–2 s). The spatial point-spread function of the hemodynamic BOLD response is in the 1 mm range, although sub-millimeter measurements, revealing cortical laminar and columnar features, have been obtained by filtering out the signals from larger blood vessels (Bandettini, 2009). A significant area of current and future work is aimed at developing new molecular reporters that can be introduced into the brain to transduce aspects of neural signaling such as calcium spikes and neurotransmitter release into MRI- detectable magnetic or chemical signals (Shapiro et al, 2010; Hsieh and Jasanoff, 2012; Koretsky, 2012), as described in section 4.5.3, below.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%