2021
DOI: 10.1177/2058460120988822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional MRI evaluation of the effect of carotid artery stenting: a case study demonstrating cognitive improvement

Abstract: Background The narrowing of the carotid arteries with plaque formation represents a major risk factor for ischemic stroke and cognitive impairments. Carotid angioplasty and stenting is a standard clinical treatment to reduce stroke risk. The cognitive effect of carotid angioplasty and stenting remains largely unknown. Purpose This study aims to provide direct evidence of possible effects of carotid angioplasty and stenting on cognition, using task-phase functional magnetic resonance imaging. Material and Metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies were conducted using high‐field MRI (3 Tesla), except two that were conducted at 1.5T (Porcu et al., 2019 ; Porcu et al., 2021 ). Only one study applied a cognitive task (Chinda et al., 2021 ), whereas the rest were resting‐state studies (Cheng et al., 2012 ; Huang et al., 2018 ; Lin et al., 2016 ; Porcu et al., 2019 ; Porcu et al., 2021 ; Tani et al., 2018 ; Wang et al., 2017 ). Clinical revascularization interventions included CAS alone (Cheng et al., 2012 ; Chinda et al., 2021 ; Huang et al., 2018 ; Tani et al., 2018 ; Wang et al., 2017 ), CEA alone (Porcu et al., 2019 ), and combined CAS and medical therapy (Lin et al., 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Most studies were conducted using high‐field MRI (3 Tesla), except two that were conducted at 1.5T (Porcu et al., 2019 ; Porcu et al., 2021 ). Only one study applied a cognitive task (Chinda et al., 2021 ), whereas the rest were resting‐state studies (Cheng et al., 2012 ; Huang et al., 2018 ; Lin et al., 2016 ; Porcu et al., 2019 ; Porcu et al., 2021 ; Tani et al., 2018 ; Wang et al., 2017 ). Clinical revascularization interventions included CAS alone (Cheng et al., 2012 ; Chinda et al., 2021 ; Huang et al., 2018 ; Tani et al., 2018 ; Wang et al., 2017 ), CEA alone (Porcu et al., 2019 ), and combined CAS and medical therapy (Lin et al., 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean age of patients across the studies was 71.2 ± 7.7 years (median = 71.4), whereas the sex ratio of the research patients was male predominated, ranging from 70 to 100% (mean = 82.0 ± 12.5 %, median = 79.5%). Most of the studies were done on asymptomatic patients (Cheng et al., 2012 ; Huang et al., 2018 ; Lin et al., 2016 ; Porcu et al., 2019 ; Porcu et al., 2021 ; Wang et al., 2017 ); one study investigated only symptomatic patients (Lin et al., 2016 ); one study investigated both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (Chinda et al., 2021 ). Only a couple of the studies (Cheng et al., 2012 ; Lin et al., 2016 ) carried out analyses of imaging findings and cognitive assessments blinded to diagnosis and treatment (Table 1A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations