Functional movement screen comparison between the preparative period and competitive period in high school baseball players

Lee, Chia‐Lun; Hsu, Mei‐Chich; Chang, Wen‐Dien; Wang, Szu-Chieh; Chen, Chao-Yen; Chou, Pei-Hsi; Chang, Nai-Jen

doi:10.1016/j.jesf.2018.06.004

Cited by 14 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 33 publications

(34 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The motion of sprinting involves the participation of various biomechanical factors throughout the body (Mero et al, 1992), while efficient and fast execution of sprint action requires not only strength but also sufficient mobility and stability (García-Pinillos et al, 2015; Nesser et al, 2008; Seitz et al, 2014). The FMS is a tool designed to assess movement, and the individual tests included in the FMS have a balance between mobility and stability as a basic requirement (Lee et al, 2018). Therefore, higher FMS total scores could have a positive effect on sprint time records.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Functional Movement Screen total score and physical performance in elite male collegiate soccer players

Lee¹,

Kim²

2019

J Exerc Rehabil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objectives of this study were to compare the differences in physical performance of elite male collegiate soccer players according to the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) total scores and to investigate the association between the FMS total score and physical performance. A total of 20 elite male collegiate soccer players (mean age, 19.6 ± 0.7 years; height, 173.4± 4.4 cm; body weight, 66.9± 7.3 kg; and body mass index, 22.0± 2.0 kg/m 2) participated in the present study. The subjects were divided into two groups: the high FMS (FMS total score ≥ 14 points, n= 10) and low FMS (FMS total score < 14 points, n= 10). All participants completed 10-m and 30-m sprint tests, the arrowhead agility test (right and left), and a coordination test. The statistical methods used to verify the study results were the independent sample t-test and Kendall's Tau b correlation test. There were significant differences between the high and low FMS groups in the 10-m (P= 0.014) and 30-m sprint (P= 0.002) and arrowhead agility tests (right, P= 0.039). Conversely, there were no significant differences in the arrowhead agility (left) and coordination tests between the two groups (P> 0.05). Moreover, the FMS total score was found to have significant negative correlations with the 10-m sprint (r=-0.444, P= 0.017), 30-m sprint (r=-0.425, P= 0.016), and arrowhead agility tests (right, r=-0.389, P= 0.023). These results suggest that higher FMS total scores could have a positive effect on the physical performance of the players.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Functional Movement Screen total score and physical performance in elite male collegiate soccer players

Lee¹,

Kim²

2019

J Exerc Rehabil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The score for each item ranges from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating pain, 1 indicating a noncompleted skill performance, 2 indicating a skill performance with compensation, and 3 indicating a skill performance without compensation. The maximum score for the FMS is 21, and a total score lower than or equal to 14 points on the FMS indicates a greater possibility of sustaining a sports injury [13]. The FMS has exhibited excellent interrater reliability (0.97) for examining adolescents [14].…”

Section: Assessmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Functional Movement Screen, Star Excursion Balance Test, and Physical Fitness in Junior Athletes with Different Sports Injury Risk

Chang

Chou

Chang

et al. 2020

BioMed Research International

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives. The aim of this study was to assess the relationships between functional movement screen (FMS), star excursion balance test (SEBT), agility T test, and vertical jump test scores and sports injury risk in junior athletes. We compared these assessments and the differences between groups with high and low risks of sports injury. Subjects and Methods. Eleven volleyball, 12 basketball, and 9 handball athletes were recruited. All participants followed the routine training in school sports teams. Weekly training schedules followed a similar pattern. The 32 junior athletes (age=16.06±0.21 years; height=167.28±6.32 cm; and body mass=68.45±9.67 kg) were assessed using the FMS, SEBT, agility T test, and vertical jump test in random order. The correlations of composite and individual item scores of these assessments were analyzed, and the differences between groups with high and low risks of sports injury were compared. Results. All participants completed the study protocol. No significant differences were observed between FMS, SEBT, agility T test, and vertical jump test scores in groups with high and low risks of sports injuries. Fair and moderate-to-good correlations were observed for anterior reach maximum of SEBT and deep squat (r=0.47, P=0.02) as well as inline lunge (r=0.53, P=0.01) of FMS. The hurdle step of FMS also exhibited moderate-to-good (r=0.52, P=0.01) and fair (r=0.42, P=0.04) correlations with posterior medial and posterior lateral reach maximum of SEBT, respectively. A fair correlation was observed between posterior lateral reach maximum of SEBT and rotary stability of FMS (r=−0.23, P=0.03). Fair and moderate-to-good correlations were identified for agility T test and maximum anterior reach in the SEBT (r=−0.42, P=0.04) and trunk stability push-up in the FMS, respectively (r=−0.57 and P=0.006). Conclusions. Junior athletes with a high risk of sports injury did not exhibit differences in terms of FMS, SEBT, and physical fitness test scores. Deep squat, hurdle step, inline lunge, and rotary stability scores in the FMS were correlated with the item scores in the SEBT, which may be due to the use of similar movement patterns. Scores for anterior reach maximum in the SEBT and trunk stability push-up in the FMS were correlated with agility T test scores, suggesting a similar task requirement of trunk stability and dynamic weight shifting ability.

show abstract

“…This is consistent with other studies that have found that FMS score does not predict injury. 30,41,42…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional Movement Screening and injury risk in elite adolescent rugby league players

Dyer

Callister

Sanctuary³

et al. 2019

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research is limited as to whether Functional Movement Screen scores relate to non-contact injury risk in rugby league players. This cohort study investigates whether the Functional Movement Screen score predicts non-contact injuries in elite adolescent rugby league players. Australian adolescent rugby league players ( n = 52; mean age 16.0 ± 1.0 years) from one club participated in this study. Functional Movement Screen scores, height, and mass were collected at the beginning of the preseason. Training, match exposure, and injury incidence data (non-contact match and training injuries with three levels of severity) were recorded for each individual athlete throughout the season. Linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association between Functional Movement Screen score (continuous score, ≤ 14 or > 14, and three subscores) and injury risk, whilst controlling for exposure time. The mean Functional Movement Screen score for the sample was 13.4 (95% CI: 11.0–14.0). A total of 72 non-contact injuries were recorded (incidence rate: 18.7 per 1000 exposure hours; 95% CI: 11.6–24.8). There were no statistically significant associations between non-contact injury and Functional Movement Screen score for any of the analyses conducted. Our results suggest that the Functional Movement Screen does not reflect non-contact injury risk in elite adolescent rugby league players. Further research should investigate whether a more sport-specific movement screen in the preseason can more effectively predict injury risk in this population.

show abstract

Functional movement screen comparison between the preparative period and competitive period in high school baseball players

Cited by 14 publications

References 33 publications

The Functional Movement Screen total score and physical performance in elite male collegiate soccer players

The Functional Movement Screen total score and physical performance in elite male collegiate soccer players

Comparison of Functional Movement Screen, Star Excursion Balance Test, and Physical Fitness in Junior Athletes with Different Sports Injury Risk

Functional Movement Screening and injury risk in elite adolescent rugby league players

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About