1998
DOI: 10.1191/026921598673571117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional motor abilities of children with cerebral palsy: a systematic literature review of assessment measures

Abstract: Although instruments developed within the last decade meet psychometric criteria more adequately than those developed previously, it is concluded that only two evaluative assessment measures, the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI), fulfil the criteria of reliability and validity with respect to responsiveness to change.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
111
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
111
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…50 Both the GMFM and PEDI are considered sensitive instruments in detecting functional change over time in children with CP. 51,52 The intention was to assess the effects of suit therapy on functioning according to all ICF dimensions. However, all studies included in our review focused on the activity dimension, particularly in gross motor function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Both the GMFM and PEDI are considered sensitive instruments in detecting functional change over time in children with CP. 51,52 The intention was to assess the effects of suit therapy on functioning according to all ICF dimensions. However, all studies included in our review focused on the activity dimension, particularly in gross motor function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…También podemos comprobar como la Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) y la Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) son los instrumentos más empleados para la valoración de la función motora en niños con parálisis cerebral, en este caso a la hora de comprobar los efectos de las terapias ecuestres, pero también de forma general aplicando otro tipo de tratamientos o terapias (Ketelaar et al, 1998;Vos-Vromans et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…This is an important aspect of taxonomy, since it emphasizes the complementarity of the rehabilitation process. It is important to assess skill deficiencies 25,26 , but the effectiveness of any program depends on the implementation of adequate activities to achieve functional goals for the patient 27,28 .…”
Section: The Fama Approach -Proposal For a Practical Use Of Motor Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%