“…The extraction coverage of a certain SPME device is a major concern when extracting multiclass contaminants in environmental water samples, as the extraction selectivity is restricted by the selected coating material. In response, researchers have attempted to improve performance by developing novel SPME coatings based on metal–organic frameworks, , covalent organic frameworks, , graphene, , MXenes, layered double hydroxides, and carbon-based nanocomposites. − However, in most applications, only one type of SPME coating can be used, which restricts the analysis to certain classes of target compounds with similar physicochemical properties. For example, while C18/PDMS coatings provide good extraction performance for nonpolar analytes (e.g., polyaromatic hydrocarbons), they are unable to extract polar analytes (e.g., artificial sweeteners). , Similarly, SPME devices with anionic exchange coatings provide good extraction performance for anionic compounds (e.g., polyfluorosulfonic acid), but relatively poor performance for most drugs of abuse, which tend to be positively charged in environmental water samples. , This issue restricts the use of SPME techniques for regular water monitoring.…”