2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional lung imaging in radiation therapy for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
76
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
5
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with the recent systematic review and meta-analysis on functional lung imaging potential in RT planning conducted by Bucknell et al [12]. With the plans optimised to spare functional lung, the authors report mean functional V 20 reduced by 4.2% (95% CI: 2.3; 6.0), and MLD by 2.2 Gy (95% CI: 1.2; 3.3) when plans were optimised to spare functional lung.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results are consistent with the recent systematic review and meta-analysis on functional lung imaging potential in RT planning conducted by Bucknell et al [12]. With the plans optimised to spare functional lung, the authors report mean functional V 20 reduced by 4.2% (95% CI: 2.3; 6.0), and MLD by 2.2 Gy (95% CI: 1.2; 3.3) when plans were optimised to spare functional lung.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Several planning studies sparing highly functional lung regions for radiation have been conducted [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In these studies, various functional imaging modalities have been used to target perfusion, ventilation or both [12,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agreement with the findings of the present study, a large number of studies showed that dosimetric parameters of radiotherapy were related to the risk of radiation-induced lung injury 14,15 . We found that the patients treated with prescription dose higher than 62 Gy or mean lung dose higher than 17.4 Gy were more likely to suffer from ARP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Ding et al [20] found that 20% of the maximum SPECT count may be the optimal threshold to define the functional lung. The threshold is a tricky parameter ranging from 20% to 90%, of which 70% and 30% are the most common [21]. The other approach utilizes the weighting function based on functional images.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%