2013
DOI: 10.1111/bph.12234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional interaction between pre‐synaptic α6β2‐containing nicotinic and adenosine A2A receptors in the control of dopamine release in the rat striatum

Abstract: These results provide the first evidence for a functional interaction between nicotinic and adenosine A2A R in striatal dopaminergic terminals, with likely therapeutic consequences for smoking, Parkinson's disease and other dopaminergic disorders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility would be a direct heteromerisation between A 2B R and A 1 R, given that A 2B R can heteromerise with different membrane proteins such as receptors (Corset et al ., ; Moriyama & Sitkovsky, ) and enzymes (Antonioli et al ., ) and A 1 R can also form dimers with different G‐protein‐coupled receptors (Gines et al ., ; Ciruela et al ., ; Kamikubo et al ., ). An alternative would be an ability of A 2B R to trigger an intracellular cross talk through its diverse G‐protein coupling (Ryzhov et al ., ; Cohen et al ., ; Liu et al ., ) to functionally desensitise A 1 R (Ciruela et al ., ; Nie et al ., ; Hashimi et al ., ; Lopes et al ., ), in a manner analogous to the ability of A 2B R to control ion channels (Garção et al ., ), G protein coupled receptors (Feoktistov & Biaggioni, ; Conde et al ., ) or growth factor receptors (Corset et al ., ). Further studies will be required to clarify the mechanism underlying the ability of A 2B R to functionally desensitise A 1 R in nerve terminals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possibility would be a direct heteromerisation between A 2B R and A 1 R, given that A 2B R can heteromerise with different membrane proteins such as receptors (Corset et al ., ; Moriyama & Sitkovsky, ) and enzymes (Antonioli et al ., ) and A 1 R can also form dimers with different G‐protein‐coupled receptors (Gines et al ., ; Ciruela et al ., ; Kamikubo et al ., ). An alternative would be an ability of A 2B R to trigger an intracellular cross talk through its diverse G‐protein coupling (Ryzhov et al ., ; Cohen et al ., ; Liu et al ., ) to functionally desensitise A 1 R (Ciruela et al ., ; Nie et al ., ; Hashimi et al ., ; Lopes et al ., ), in a manner analogous to the ability of A 2B R to control ion channels (Garção et al ., ), G protein coupled receptors (Feoktistov & Biaggioni, ; Conde et al ., ) or growth factor receptors (Corset et al ., ). Further studies will be required to clarify the mechanism underlying the ability of A 2B R to functionally desensitise A 1 R in nerve terminals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is fuelled by the observation that A 2B R display a lower affinity for adenosine than the other adenosine receptors (Fredholm et al ., ), suggesting that A 2B R may be preferentially activated under noxious conditions associated with higher extracellular levels of adenosine (Dunwiddie & Masino, ; Popoli & Pepponi, ). However, some studies suggest that A 2B R might also control neurotransmitter release through interaction with other receptors (Moriyama & Sitkovsky, ; Garção et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A 2A R are mostly located in glutamatergic synapses, 153 although they have been shown in other synapses, such as GABAergic 146,154,155 (Fig. 4C), dopaminergic, 156,157 cholinergic, 158,159 serotoninergic, 160,161 or noradrenergic synapses. 162 Adenosine levels are tightly controlled by a complex machinery of enzymes.…”
Section: The Modulation Of Aged Synapse By Adenosine a 2a Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Baseline effect of treatments was compared to the appropriate control baseline levels in the presence of DMSO vehicle at a given time point, and expressed as a % change as above. The principle of effect size calculations was reported earlier by Garção et al (2013). Normalized data were tested for normal distribution by the KolmogoroveSmirnov test.…”
Section: Data Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%