2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06751.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional imaging studies of emotion regulation: a synthetic review and evolving model of the cognitive control of emotion

Abstract: This paper reviews and synthesizes functional imaging research that over the past decade has begun to offer new insights into the brain mechanisms underlying emotion regulation. Towards that end, the first section of the paper outlines a model of the processes and neural systems involved in emotion generation and regulation. The second section surveys recent research supporting and elaborating the model, focusing primarily on studies of the most commonly investigated strategy, which is known as reappraisal. At… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

114
1,522
9
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,526 publications
(1,698 citation statements)
references
References 207 publications
114
1,522
9
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The frontal regions that showed differential FC between GAD and HCs during high error feedback trials (i.e., dACC, sgACC, AI, DLPFC), are involved in salience identification, error monitoring and emotional control (Botvinick et al., 2004; Menon & Uddin, 2010; Ochsner et al., 2012; Uddin, 2015). Decreased PFC‐amygdala connectivity is perhaps the most consistent FC abnormality reported for these regions in GAD (Hilbert et al., 2014; Mochcovitch et al., 2014; Taylor & Whalen, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frontal regions that showed differential FC between GAD and HCs during high error feedback trials (i.e., dACC, sgACC, AI, DLPFC), are involved in salience identification, error monitoring and emotional control (Botvinick et al., 2004; Menon & Uddin, 2010; Ochsner et al., 2012; Uddin, 2015). Decreased PFC‐amygdala connectivity is perhaps the most consistent FC abnormality reported for these regions in GAD (Hilbert et al., 2014; Mochcovitch et al., 2014; Taylor & Whalen, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), dorsal, rostral, and subcallosal (including subgenual) ACC (dACC, rACC, sgACC), and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) are engaged during DM under uncertainty (Krain, Wilson, Arbuckle, Castellanos, & Milham, 2006); dACC, rACC, sgACC, and AI are activated during salience processing and error monitoring (Barch et al., 2001; Botvinick, Cohen, & Carter, 2004; Braver, Barch, Gray, Molfese, & Snyder, 2001; Menon & Uddin, 2010; Uddin, 2015; Ullsperger & von Cramon, 2001); and ACC, AI and amygdala are involved in emotion regulation (Ochsner, Silvers, & Buhle, 2012). Importantly, coupling of these regions comprises proposed neural networks underlying the cognitive‐emotional processes involved in DM (Khani & Rainer, 2016; Rushworth, Kolling, Sallet, & Mars, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous fMRI studies have related the mPFC to various processes involved in self‐ and other‐related cognition. For example, the mPFC was implicated in self‐referential processing (van der Meer et al., 2010; Northoff et al., 2006; Qin & Northoff, 2011) and attending to emotional responses related to the self (Satpute, Shu, Weber, Roy, & Ochsner, 2013) and emotion regulation (Ochsner et al., 2012). Furthermore, the mPFC is known to be functionally (Denny, Kober, Wager, & Ochsner, 2012; Kanske, Böckler, Trautwein, & Singer, 2015; Mitchell, Macrae, & Banaji, 2006; Yaoi, Osaka, & Osaka, 2009) and structurally (Valk, Bernhardt, Böckler, Trautwein, et al., 2016) involved in socio‐cognitive abilities, as well as meta‐cognition on perceptual information (Fleming & Dolan, 2012; Valk, Bernhardt, Böckler, Kanske, et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the right dlPFC was more strongly associated with increased negative emotional word use after the Perspective Module and is known to be related to self‐referential processing (Schmitz, Kawahara‐Baccus, & Johnson, 2004; Wu et al., 2015) as well as to self‐control (Steinbeis, Bernhardt & Singer, 2012) and emotion regulation (Moore et al., 2016; Ochsner & Gross, 2005; Ochsner et al., 2012). In a previous study, dlPFC and also mPFC activity were related to cognitive reappraisal and mindfulness as strategies to regulate one's emotions (Opialla et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation