2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional imaging of the human dopaminergic midbrain

Abstract: Invasive recording of dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) of behaving animals suggests a role for these neurons in reward learning and novelty processing. In humans, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is currently the only non-invasive event-related method to measure SN/VTA activity, but it is debated to what extent fMRI enables inference about dopaminergic responses within the SN/VTA. We consider the anatomical and functional parcellation of the primate SN/VT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
181
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
11
181
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Abler et al 2006;Burke et al 2010;Spicer et al 2007;Tobler et al 2007) and more specific predictions of formal learning theories Kahnt et al, 2012;Rutledge et al, 2010;Tobler et al, 2007). However, it is worth keeping in mind that the haemodynamic response measured with neuroimaging is nonspecific rather than a one-to-one reflection of a particular neural event such as dopamine release (see also Düzel et al 2009), which could explain why some fMRI studies have suggested positive coding of losses (Seymour et al 2004; although see also Tom et al 2007) and a dominance of action over value (Guitart-Masip et al, 2012 (Kamin, 1969) used an aversive between-subjects design; by contrast, the experiment described in the text and depicted in abbreviated form here (Waelti et al, 2001) used an appetitive within-subject design where the test consists of a comparison between Y and X (see also Figure 2A); The optogenetic unblocking experiment of Steinberg et al (2013) used a between-subject design.…”
Section: Phasic Dopamine Signals Represent Model-free Prediction Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abler et al 2006;Burke et al 2010;Spicer et al 2007;Tobler et al 2007) and more specific predictions of formal learning theories Kahnt et al, 2012;Rutledge et al, 2010;Tobler et al, 2007). However, it is worth keeping in mind that the haemodynamic response measured with neuroimaging is nonspecific rather than a one-to-one reflection of a particular neural event such as dopamine release (see also Düzel et al 2009), which could explain why some fMRI studies have suggested positive coding of losses (Seymour et al 2004; although see also Tom et al 2007) and a dominance of action over value (Guitart-Masip et al, 2012 (Kamin, 1969) used an aversive between-subjects design; by contrast, the experiment described in the text and depicted in abbreviated form here (Waelti et al, 2001) used an appetitive within-subject design where the test consists of a comparison between Y and X (see also Figure 2A); The optogenetic unblocking experiment of Steinberg et al (2013) used a between-subject design.…”
Section: Phasic Dopamine Signals Represent Model-free Prediction Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Error bars, here and in subsequent figures, depict s.e.m. *P < 0.05. uncorrected height threshold of P< 0.001 and extent threshold of 10 contiguous voxels are presented in Tables 1-3. We consider activation of the entire SN/VTA complex rather than individual components because in humans, mesolimbic and mesocortical dopaminergic projection systems are dispersed throughout the SN/VTA complex (Duzel et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced memory for novel, or salient, stimuli is thought to be mediated by dopamine via hippocampal inputs from the dopaminergic midbrain (Lisman and Grace, 2005), which comprises the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) (Duzel et al, 2009). In humans, processing of unexpected, salient stimuli can be studied using "oddball" paradigms, in which the oddball stimulus deviates from its prevailing context along a particular dimension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations