2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2022.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional genomic tools for emerging model species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(128 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, existing annotations provide only a hint on how these genes may influence morph development. Our results thus echo recent calls for a broader application of functional validation tools, in order to understand how lineage-specific genes contribute to phenotypic variation in natural populations 52 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, existing annotations provide only a hint on how these genes may influence morph development. Our results thus echo recent calls for a broader application of functional validation tools, in order to understand how lineage-specific genes contribute to phenotypic variation in natural populations 52 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We did uncover two interesting candidate genes, both involved in flight behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster . Future studies could investigate their expression and methylation profiles across ontogenetic stages and assess their potential functions associated with migratory behaviour using, for example, RNAi or CRISPR‐Cas9 methodologies (Gudmunds et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that methylation proportion at NR1D1 , but not at CLDN22 remained related to infection status, and that recruitment probability of fledged juveniles infected by S. trachea was positively related to methylation levels at NR1D1 . This underscores the importance of performing follow‐up studies on putative candidate genes, and ideally the need for functional studies on methylation levels at candidate genes (Gudmunds et al, 2022 ; Husby, 2020 , 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the limited sample size of our RRBS dataset reduces the power to detect CpG sites with small differences in DNA methylation and the limited sample size could also lead to inflation of effect sizes. For the above reasons, it is important that the DMCs identified here should be regarded as candidate loci until verification or ideally functional studies have been done (Gudmunds et al, 2022 ). Accordingly, the MS‐HRM analyses we used to verify the relationship between methylation proportion and infection status for NR1D1 and CLDN22 serve as a first step toward substantiating the results of the differential methylation analyses in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%