2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2016.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional generalizations of Hoeffding’s covariance lemma and a formula for Kendall’s tau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…) is upper-bounded by a term which converges in probability to a finite constant. This can be verified in an almost identical manner to the approach for (23) in the proof of Lemma C.2; hence we have verified that (31) converges in probability to zero.…”
Section: Lemma C4 Assume (A1) Then If For Anysupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…) is upper-bounded by a term which converges in probability to a finite constant. This can be verified in an almost identical manner to the approach for (23) in the proof of Lemma C.2; hence we have verified that (31) converges in probability to zero.…”
Section: Lemma C4 Assume (A1) Then If For Anysupporting
confidence: 71%
“…) converges in probability to a finite constant and our proof is concluded by the argument associated to (23).…”
Section: Lemma C1 Assume (A1) Then If For Anymentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the issues of the proof is that the Wasserstein coupling is not the coupling which minimizes the expectation ofφ(v 4ξ ⊗ v 8ξ ) with respect to any coupling of (η l n , η l−1 n ). To see this, one can construct a functional covariance equality for μ(φ(v 4ξ ⊗ v 8ξ )) (μ is any coupling of (η l n , η l−1 n ) such that μ(φ(v 4ξ ⊗ v 8ξ )) < +∞) as in [24,Theorem 3.1] (that is, in terms of the CDFs of μ, η l n , and η l−1 n , as in Hoeffding's lemma), and then when centering with (η l n ⊗ η l−1 n )(φ(v 4ξ ⊗ v 8ξ )) and applying Hoeffding-Fréchet bounds, one observes thatη W n is not optimal. As a result, one cannot transfer betweenη W n andη C n as is done in the proofs of Lemmata F.7-F.8, nor can one use Kantorovich duality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, we noticed attempts to generalize these formulae. Besides a specific moment, Lo (2017) studied alternative formulae for the covariance between transformations of two random variables. Song and Wang (2019b) extended these formulae to more general moment generating functions for both continuous and discrete, as well as univariate and multivariate, cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%