2000
DOI: 10.1038/sj.thj.6200047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional G-CSF pathways in t(8;21) leukemic cells allow for differentiation induction and degradation of AML1-ETO

Abstract: The data presented here supports the claim that G-CSF can induce in vitro and in vivo differentiation of M2 AML t(8;21) cells.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to ligand-binding, surface expression of the mutant G-CSFR forms was found to be increased, which correlated with sustained intracellular activation and enhanced growth and survival responses to G-CSF [10,29,30,36]. Increased expression of the G-CSFR either at the mRNA or protein level has also been reported in patients with AML without antecedent SCN, and in patients with CML and acute and chronic lymphoid leukemias [37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to ligand-binding, surface expression of the mutant G-CSFR forms was found to be increased, which correlated with sustained intracellular activation and enhanced growth and survival responses to G-CSF [10,29,30,36]. Increased expression of the G-CSFR either at the mRNA or protein level has also been reported in patients with AML without antecedent SCN, and in patients with CML and acute and chronic lymphoid leukemias [37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, it has been demonstrated that G-CSF is capable of inducing in vitro and in vivo maturation of t(8;21) AML cells. 38,39 On the other hand, despite the large number of randomized (and generally negative) G-CSF studies reported to date in AML patients, 40 we do not know if there is any interaction between G-CSF therapy and the presence of the t(8;21) translocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These up-regulations are rapid and transcriptionally regulated, whereas subsequent decrease of RARa or PML ± RARa are post-transcriptional and related to proteasome degradation (Zhu et al, 1999), as also noted after dierentiation of APL cells via CD44 activation (Charrad et al, 1999) or for other hematopoietic oncogenes or transcriptional proteins such as AML 1 ± ETO or ETO (Da Silva et al, 2000) once dierentiation is achieved. Most other RA-target genes, such as C/EBPe (Morosetti et al, 1997) have been studied in cell lines, but have not to date been reported on fresh APL cells (Altucci et al, 2001).…”
Section: Retinoic Acid Signaling Pathways In Apl Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%