Functional Frameworks for Socialized Digital Curation: Curatorial Interventions and Curation Spaces in Archives and Libraries

Sabharwal, Arjun

doi:10.1353/lib.2021.0009

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Academic institutions can contribute to cultural heritage information practices by providing expertise and scientific research (Zhao et al, 2020), and many high-impact cultural heritage digitization projects have the support of academic institutions (Hu et al, 2018;Kumpulainen & Late, 2022;Liang et al, 2020;Price, 2016;Tedd, 2011). Finally, both traditional mass media and emerging social media are important channels to help publicize and promote information practices in the cultural heritage field (Sabharwal, 2021;Tedd, 2011). Social media, in particular, will be increasingly used for the creation, sharing, and long-term preservation of cultural heritage information in the future (Liang et al, 2021;Terras, 2015a).…”

Section: Core Actors Of Vccmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In general, the models of VCC in the cultural heritage domain emphasize participation and collaboration between various stakeholders to create value and enhance the overall experience and appreciation of cultural heritage information practices. It recognizes that cultural heritage is not solely the responsibility of • Open data curation in GLAMs (Owens, 2016) • Cultural co-creation in museums (Blaschitz et al, 2022) • Digital curation practices in digital humanities (Poole, 2017;Sabharwal, 2021) •…”

Section: Dominant Models Of Value Co-creationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is worth mentioning that, after collating 108 papers in this literature pool, we found that there are 51 papers in which GLAMs are involved in VCC activities, among which 32 articles explicitly mention that GLAMs initiate and lead VCC in various cultural heritage projects, and two types of institutions, museums, and libraries, are predominant. Further, the roles played by GLAMs in cultural heritage VCC were identified, including the provision of management (Tanackoviae & Badurina, 2008), collections (Spence, 2005), infrastructures (Borgman et al, 2019; Jarusawat et al, 2018), services (Della Corte et al, 2017), information professionals (Jarusawat et al, 2018; Sabharwal, 2021), and funding (Errichiello & Micera, 2018), as shown in Figure 4. These roles are reflected in some projects initiated and led by GLAMs.…”

Section: Core Actors Of Vccmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Value co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices: Literature review and future agenda: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

Zhao,

Lian,

Zhang

et al. 2023

Asso for Info Science & Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Value co‐creation as a research topic has been a critical proposition of interest to a wide range of disciplines. In recent years, the field of cultural heritage has also developed a range of information practices to promote different forms of value co‐creation. While the body of literature has begun to accumulate, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of conceptual foundations and how value co‐creation is implemented in cultural heritage information practices. This paper conducted a hermeneutic literature review to understand and conceptualize the core aspects of value co‐creation in various cultural heritage information works. In particular, this paper provides a research mapping of the genres of co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices, the actors, and the roles played by the stakeholders. Further, this review provides an overview of the dominant value co‐creation models in the cultural heritage field. It distills the drivers of value co‐creation and the core value consequences that arise from a process perspective. Finally, this paper puts forward a thematic, theoretical, and methodological agenda for future work based on these findings. The review contributes to the literature by proposing an integrated conceptual framework that summarizes the core elements of value co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices. The framework also serves as a call for action, providing a general understanding of the conceptual foundation for future research.

show abstract