1992
DOI: 10.2490/jjrm1963.29.217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Evaluation after Stroke Using the FIM(Functional Independence Measure); the Relationship between the FIM and the Barthel Index, and the Contribution of Communication Scores or Social Cognition Scores.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It comprises 13 items assessing physical function and five items evaluating cognitive function; each item is scored from 1 to 7. This scoring system facilitates the precise assessment of a patient's activities of daily living, making it a frequently used tool for determining the effectiveness of rehabilitation and predicting outcomes (15,16). Therefore, we assessed the recovery levels after rehabilitation using FIM efficiency based on the FIM scores at admission and discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It comprises 13 items assessing physical function and five items evaluating cognitive function; each item is scored from 1 to 7. This scoring system facilitates the precise assessment of a patient's activities of daily living, making it a frequently used tool for determining the effectiveness of rehabilitation and predicting outcomes (15,16). Therefore, we assessed the recovery levels after rehabilitation using FIM efficiency based on the FIM scores at admission and discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scoring system facilitates the precise assessment of the daily activities of a patient, making it a frequently used tool for determining the effectiveness of rehabilitation and predicting outcomes. 13,14…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This measure documents five levels (I‐V) of cognition for patients with a brain injury. It has shown both high reliability, such as equivalence and interrater reliability (Granger, Albrecht, & Hamilton, 1979; Loewen & Anderson, 1988; Wolfe, Taub, Woodrow, & Burney, 1991), and high criterion‐related validity (Gresham, Phillips, & Labi, 1980; Sonoda et al ., 1992). The LOCFAS evaluates the cognitive function of a patient with brain damage, but in contrast to the JCS, the higher the score, the less serious is the problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beginning in the late 1970s,Granger et al 1) , Linacre et al 2) , Chino et al 3) , Niki 4) , Masakado et al 5) , Tsuji et al 6) and Sonoda et al 7) conducted studies on the difficulty of ADL items for stroke patients using the Barthel Index or the functional independence measure (FIM). Following these studies, Ueda, Okawa and others [8][9][10][11][12] from the early 1990s began reporting ADL gaps between the level of potential activity and the level of actual activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%