“…BiKEs and TriKEs have other advantages, such as providing a stronger interaction with anti-CD16 than the one observed in natural CD16-Fc antibody interactions [ 353 ], having reduced size (50–75 kDa) in comparison to bi- and tri-specific antibodies (300–450 kDa) [ 354 ], which leads to a better biodistribution needed for the treatment of solid tumors, in addition to being non-immunogenic [ 350 ]. BiKEs and TriKEs have already been developed and evaluated for a broad variety of antigens from different tumors, such as CD30 for Hodgkin’s lymphoma [ 355 , 356 ], HER2 for breast cancer [ 357 , 358 , 359 ], CD19 for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma cells [ 360 , 361 , 362 ], CD33 or CD33 together with CD123 for acute myeloid leukemia [ 363 , 364 ] (NCT03214666), EpCAM for carcinomas [ 365 ], CD133 for colorectal cancer [ 366 ], EGFR for carcinomas [ 295 , 367 , 368 ], and B7-H3 for a variety of solid tumors [ 369 ]—but not yet for GBM. Further alternatives that have been already discussed in the literature include the blockage of immune checkpoint receptors via scFvs, and scFv blocking of TGF-β or ADAM-17— the later, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase involved in CD16 shedding [ 349 ].…”