2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional diversity of macrobenthic assemblages decreases in response to sewage discharges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also find unexpected patterns in FE. In the short term and on local scales, as in pollution events, FE is generally expected to decline in perturbed ecosystems as taxonomic diversity drops and a few stresstolerant or opportunistic species predominate (59,60). However, the opposite appears to be true for the mass extinctions and along the LDG, indicating that exploration of these apparent consequences of scale is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also find unexpected patterns in FE. In the short term and on local scales, as in pollution events, FE is generally expected to decline in perturbed ecosystems as taxonomic diversity drops and a few stresstolerant or opportunistic species predominate (59,60). However, the opposite appears to be true for the mass extinctions and along the LDG, indicating that exploration of these apparent consequences of scale is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…org/ package= FD; Laliberté et al 2014). To measure functional diversity, we used functional divergence (FDiv) since it is independent of sampling effort (Villéger et al 2008) and has an advantage over other functional diversity indices to infer environmental status (Gusmao et al 2016, Xu et al 2018b. FDiv was computed using the 'FD' package in R 3.5.3 (Laliberté et al 2014).…”
Section: Trait Analysis and Functional Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show this, we record the index as a function of the relative abundances of species as for an ecological assemblage with a group of S species and a total of N individuals. As mentioned previously, ecologists use the observed species relative abundance (i.e., , where ) when calculating the index ( Ricotta, 2004 , 2005a ; Botta-Dukat, 2005 ; Gusmao et al, 2016 ); therefore, the observed Rao’s quadratic diversity index becomes which can also be recognized as the MLE of Rao’s quadratic diversity index.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rao’s quadratic diversity index is one of the most important biodiversity metrics that is widely applied to studies of functional and phylogenetic ecology ( Rao, 1982 , 2010 ; Mouchet et al, 2010 ). Its standard computation is to sum up the species’ distance between a pair of species i and j ( d ij ) that is weighted by the product of the relative abundances of both species ( p i and p ij ), given by ( Botta-Dukat, 2005 ; Ricotta, 2005a ; Gusmao et al, 2016 ), where represents the relative abundance distribution of the assemblage with S species. Here, species’ distance can be very flexible, ranging from phylogenetic to functional (or trait) distances ( Ricotta, 2005b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%