2018
DOI: 10.1111/geb.12776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional diversity mediates macroecological variation in plant–hummingbird interaction networks

Abstract: Aim Species interaction networks are known to vary in structure over large spatial scales. We investigated the hypothesis that environmental factors affect interaction network structure by influencing the functional diversity of ecological communities. Notably, we expect more functionally diverse communities to form interaction networks with a higher degree of niche partitioning. Location: Americas. Time period: Current. Major taxa studied: Hummingbirds and their nectar plants. Methods We used a large dataset … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
55
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

7
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(170 reference statements)
4
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further analyses using finer measures that consider climatic fluctuations in the past might unveil different effects on biotic specialization. Similarly, other environmental variables, such as precipitation, have been related to the geographical variation of network nestedness (Sebastián-González et al 2015), modularity (Trøjelsgaard and Olesen 2013, Sebastián-González et al 2015), or to the biotic specialization of plant-hummingbird communities (Dalsgaard et al 2011, Maruyama et al 2018). However, our aim was to evaluate the effect of climatic constancy on biotic specialization and, therefore, precipitation was not included in the analyses given that it is not directly related to a region’s climatic constancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further analyses using finer measures that consider climatic fluctuations in the past might unveil different effects on biotic specialization. Similarly, other environmental variables, such as precipitation, have been related to the geographical variation of network nestedness (Sebastián-González et al 2015), modularity (Trøjelsgaard and Olesen 2013, Sebastián-González et al 2015), or to the biotic specialization of plant-hummingbird communities (Dalsgaard et al 2011, Maruyama et al 2018). However, our aim was to evaluate the effect of climatic constancy on biotic specialization and, therefore, precipitation was not included in the analyses given that it is not directly related to a region’s climatic constancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we evaluate the direction of the abundance-generalisation relationship in plant-hummingbird pollination networks and use a null model to assess the extent to which observed patterns of species-level generalisation can be explained by neutral effects. Plant-hummingbird interactions are a particularly interesting model system to answer these questions as they involve species spanning the entire specialisation-generalisation spectrum (Bleiweiss 1998, Martín González et al 2015, Dalsgaard et al 2018, Maruyama et al 2018. Additionally, pollination by vertebrates is important, especially in the tropics (Bawa 1990, Vizentin-Bugoni et al 2018, and is on average responsible for 63% of fruit or seed production in vertebrate-pollinated plants (Ratto et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The partitioning of resources among species within ecological communities has implications for co‐existence and may thereby affect geographical patterns in species richness (Dobzhansky, ; Michalet et al., ; Schemske, ). Resource partitioning among species having different morphological traits is thought to enable them to specialize on resources that are inaccessible or energetically less favorable to competitors (Dehling, Jordano, Schaefer, Böhning‐Gaese & Schleuning, ; Grant & Grant, ; Maruyama et al., ; Stang, Klinkhamer & Van Der Meijden, ; Temeles & Kress, ). For instance, within mutualistic systems, such as flowering plants and their pollinators, morphological co‐adaptations may result in plants having floral corolla shapes matching the feeding apparatus of their most effective animal pollinators (e.g., Darwin, ; Rothschild, ; Temeles & Kress, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%