2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Dissection of the Pol V Largest Subunit CTD in RNA-Directed DNA Methylation

Abstract: Summary Plant multisubunit RNA Polymerase V transcription recruits Argonaute-siRNA complexes that specify sites of RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) for gene silencing. Pol V’s largest subunit, NRPE1, evolved from the largest subunit of Pol II but has a distinctive carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD). We show that the Pol V CTD is dispensable for catalytic activity in vitro, yet essential in vivo. One CTD subdomain (DeCL) is required for Pol V function at virtually all loci. Other CTD subdomains have locus-specif… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the use of more fine-grained phenotypes allowed to refine previous associations, identifying candidate causal polymorphisms in both CMT2 and NRPE1 (Fig 2). Furthermore, by comparing the genome-wide mCHH pattern with published data for loss-of-function mutations [13,19], we were able to establish the causal involvement of these genes (Figs 3 and 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the use of more fine-grained phenotypes allowed to refine previous associations, identifying candidate causal polymorphisms in both CMT2 and NRPE1 (Fig 2). Furthermore, by comparing the genome-wide mCHH pattern with published data for loss-of-function mutations [13,19], we were able to establish the causal involvement of these genes (Figs 3 and 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008492.g003 NRPE1', by contrast, is clearly less specific, and showed strong correlations with loss-offunction phenotypes of nine genes in the RdDM pathway (including, of course, NRPE1 itself). However, since none of these genes, nor any other plausible candidate, is located near NRPE1 (S5 Fig), it seems reasonable to assume that the non-synonymous polymorphisms in this gene, particularly in RNA polymerase domain, cause a phenotype similar to knocking out NRPE1 [19], rather than by somehow regulating an unknown member of the RdDM pathway (S5 and S6 Figs). The relative lack of specificity of NRPE1 can also be seen from the comparison of natural alleles and knock-out mutations.…”
Section: Causality Of Nrpe1 and Cmt2 Allelesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Furthermore, by comparing the genome-wide mCHH pattern with published data for loss-of-function mutations [13, 19], we were able to establish the causal involvement of these genes (Figs 3-4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…NRPE1’ , by contrast, is clearly less specific, and showed strong correlations with loss-of-function phenotypes of nine genes in the RdDM pathway (including, of course, NRPE1 itself). However, since none of these genes, nor any other plausible candidate, is located near NRPE1 (S5 Fig), it seems reasonable to assume that the non-synonymous polymorphisms in this gene, particularly in RNA polymerase domain, cause a phenotype similar to knocking out NRPE1 [19], rather than by somehow regulating an unknown member of the RdDM pathway (S5-6 Figs). The relative lack of specificity of NRPE1 can also be seen from the comparison of natural alleles and knock-out mutations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation