1992
DOI: 10.1016/0166-218x(92)90028-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional dependencies in relational databases: A lattice point of view

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The set of all Moore families on a set Q is closely related to K n . Bernard Monjardet pointed out to me that results stronger than semimodularity are known for this set, e.g., Demetrovics, Libkin, and Muchnik (1992). Apparently, the most far-reaching result was recently obtained by Nathalie Caspard, drawing on the concept of dependence relations, cf.…”
Section: Discussion and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The set of all Moore families on a set Q is closely related to K n . Bernard Monjardet pointed out to me that results stronger than semimodularity are known for this set, e.g., Demetrovics, Libkin, and Muchnik (1992). Apparently, the most far-reaching result was recently obtained by Nathalie Caspard, drawing on the concept of dependence relations, cf.…”
Section: Discussion and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The formal concept analysis approach discovers functional dependencies from the view of formal concept analysis. By considering the relationship between relational database theory and formal concept analysis (Demetrovics et al 1992), the functional dependencies that hold in a database can be extracted by using a predefined formal concept analysis closure operator. In Lopes et al (2002), the authors conclude that the qualitative comparison between DepMiner (or FastFDs) and TANE (or FUN) is difficult because the approaches widely differ.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perhaps less known version but very important for its applications is the notion of (full) implicational system. As examples of implicational systems we can mention functional dependencies in relational databases (Maier 1983;Demetrovics et al 1992) or attribute implications in data mining. The standard example of attribute implications is usually taken from transactional databases that can be represented as a binary context (E, A, R) where E is a set of market baskets, A a set of attributes (items) and R the binary relation linking a market basket to the attributes it contains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%