2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-18588/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional decline in geriatric rehabilitation ward; is it ascribable to Hospital Acquired Infection? A prospective cohort study.

Abstract: Background: Some patients may not benefit from their stay in a geriatric rehabilitation unit and paradoxically worsened their functional status. The incidence of functional decline in these units and factors associated with this decline have not been clearly identified. Methods: We used a prospective cohort of consecutive patients aged ≥ 75 years admitted to a geriatric rehabilitation unit in a French university hospital. The main endpoint was functional decline defined by at least an one-point decrease in Act… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The larger improvements in physical function identified in the hospital-based group were likely because of the clear presence of a ceiling effect for both ADL and IADL. We subsequently did not expect that the short duration and likely low intensity of physical activity during geriatric rehabilitation would correspond with short-term changes in ADL and IADL in this cohort; rather, these changes were more likely due to disease burden and subsequent treatment response, 47 which we were unable to control for given the small sample. Furthermore, physical activity assessed postdischarge is likely a better determinant of future ADL and IADL trajectories as it is free of the previously mentioned hospitalassociated barriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The larger improvements in physical function identified in the hospital-based group were likely because of the clear presence of a ceiling effect for both ADL and IADL. We subsequently did not expect that the short duration and likely low intensity of physical activity during geriatric rehabilitation would correspond with short-term changes in ADL and IADL in this cohort; rather, these changes were more likely due to disease burden and subsequent treatment response, 47 which we were unable to control for given the small sample. Furthermore, physical activity assessed postdischarge is likely a better determinant of future ADL and IADL trajectories as it is free of the previously mentioned hospitalassociated barriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%