1968
DOI: 10.1159/000143198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional cranial analysis of mammalian mandibular ramal morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This lower edge is formed of the pterygoid ridge or the antilingula, and of the lower edge of the mylohyoid groove. The groove is thus a clear boundary between two different anatomo-functional structures from the subdivision established by Moss [32]: the basal unit and the angular unit.…”
Section: Coordinated Nature Of the Area Perilingularismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This lower edge is formed of the pterygoid ridge or the antilingula, and of the lower edge of the mylohyoid groove. The groove is thus a clear boundary between two different anatomo-functional structures from the subdivision established by Moss [32]: the basal unit and the angular unit.…”
Section: Coordinated Nature Of the Area Perilingularismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There are two basic types of functional matrices: periosteal and capsular [Moss, 1968a]. For the purpose of this paper, only periosteal matrices need to be discussed.…”
Section: Functional Cranial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1959: Maxwell andWagner, 1951J. Briefly, it is experimentally and clinically demonstrable that periosteal functional matrices are morphogcnetically and temporally primary: and that the presence, form (size and shape), and transformative growth [Moss andSalentijn. 1969, 1970] of any skeletal unit is secondary, compensatory, and me chanically obligatory to temporally prior changes in the related periosteal functional matrices [Moss and Hankow.…”
Section: Functional Cranial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
169Mandibular growth that is infl uenced by co-activation of jaw muscles influences craniofacial morphology, 1,2) and is closely related to the amount and direction of condylar growth.3) The primary factor determining the magnitude and direction of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) load is the interaction of muscle forces.4) The magnitude and distribution of functional stress within the TMJ is important for the development of the TMJ.
5)However, excessive loads, 5, 6) loads with a long duration 5,7) and loads at high frequency 5,8)
Abstract:The interactions between orofacial muscles and skeletal patterns are widely recognized as significant factors in craniofacial growth. Many studies have suggested that the vertical facial growth pattern correlates with occlusal forces and the activity of masticatory muscles.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mandibular growth that is infl uenced by co-activation of jaw muscles influences craniofacial morphology, 1,2) and is closely related to the amount and direction of condylar growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%